首页> 外文期刊>Forest Science >Sample-Based Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Forests-A New. Approach to Account for Both Sampling and Model Errors
【24h】

Sample-Based Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Forests-A New. Approach to Account for Both Sampling and Model Errors

机译:基于样本的森林温室气体排放估算-新。解决抽样误差和模型误差的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Good Practice Guidance (GPG) for reporting emissions and removals of greenhouse gases from the land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULLICF) sector of the United Nation's Framework Convention on Climate Change states that uncertainty estimates should always accompany the estimates of net emissions. Two basic procedures are suggested: simple error propagation and Monte-Carlo simulation. In this article, we argue that these methods are not very well-suited for uncertainty assessments in connection with sample-based surveys such as national forest inventories (NFIs), which provide a majority of the data for the LULUCF sector reporting in several countries. We suggest that a more straightforward approach would be to use standard sampling theory for assessing the sampling errors; however, it may be important to also include the error contribution from biomass and other models that are applied and this requires new methods for the variance estimation. In this article, a method for sample-based uncertainty assessment, including both model and sampling errors, is developed and applied using data from the NFIs of Finland and Sweden. The study revealed that the model error contribution to the combined sampling-model mean square error of ratio estimators of mean aboveground biomass on forestland amounted to about 10% in both countries. In estimating 5-year change of the corresponding biomass stocks, using permanent sampling units, the model error contribution was reduced to less than 1%. The smaller impact in the case of change estimation is due to the fact that any tendency of models to either over- or underestimate due to random parameter estimation errors will be the same both at the beginning and the end of a study period. The fairly small model error contributions in our study are due to the large number of sample trees used in the fitting of biomass models in Finland and Sweden; with less sample trees the model error contributions could be expected to be substantial. The proposed framework applies not only to greenhouse gas inventories but also to traditional NFI estimates of, e.g., growing stock in which uncertainties due to model errors typically are neglected in applications.
机译:根据《联合国气候变化框架公约》的土地使用,土地利用变化和林业(LULLICF)部门报告温室气体排放和清除的良好做法指南(GPG)指出,不确定性估算应始终与净排放量。建议了两个基本过程:简单错误传播和蒙特卡洛仿真。在本文中,我们认为,这些方法不太适合与基于样本的调查(例如国家森林清单(NFI))相关的不确定性评估,该调查为多个国家的LULUCF行业报告提供了大部分数据。我们建议一种更直接的方法是使用标准抽样理论来评估抽样误差。但是,可能重要的是还应包括生物量和其他模型的误差贡献,这需要方差估计的新方法。在本文中,使用来自芬兰和瑞典的NFI的数据,开发并应用了一种基于样本的不确定性评估方法,包括模型误差和采样误差。研究表明,模型误差对林地平均地上生物量比率估计量的组合采样模型均方误差的贡献在两个国家中约为10%。在使用永久性采样单位估算相应生物量库的5年变化时,模型误差贡献降低到小于1%。在变化估计的情况下影响较小,是由于以下事实:在研究阶段的开始和结束时,由于随机参数估计误差而导致模型过高或过低估计的趋势都是相同的。在我们的研究中,模型误差的贡献很小,这是因为在芬兰和瑞典,用于拟合生物量模型的样本树数量很多。如果样本树较少,则模型误差的贡献可能会很大。拟议的框架不仅适用于温室气体清单,还适用于传统的NFI估算,例如,不断增长的存货,其中在应用中通常会忽略由于模型误差导致的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号