首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >Implementing REDD plus at the national level: Stakeholder engagement and policy coherences between REDD plus rules and Kenya's sectoral policies
【24h】

Implementing REDD plus at the national level: Stakeholder engagement and policy coherences between REDD plus rules and Kenya's sectoral policies

机译:在国家一级实施REDD plus:REDD plus规则与肯尼亚部门政策之间的利益相关方参与和政策一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effective implementation of rules on reduced emission from avoided deforestation and forest degradation (REDD +) depends on the compatibility between these rules and existing sectoral policies associated with forests. This paper applies content analysis of policy documents, semi-structured interviews and case study analysis to examine the interplay between REDD + rules and Kenyan sectorial policies and local socioeconomic settings. Results reveal that the preparation of national REDD + strategies in Kenya is usefully coordinated by the Kenyan forestry sector drawing on the sector's policy mandate and past experiences in forest management. This sectoral mainstreaming however degenerates into negative vertical policy interplay caused by poor consultations with key sectors outside the forestry sector e.g. lands and agriculture and is further exacerbated by sectoral competition for climate finance. Analysis of REDD + coherences with sectoral policies revealed that forest polices on reforestation and decentralisation are coherent with REDD+ rules (horizontal interplay) but this coherence is impeded by limited implementation of these measures e.g. poor support and coordination of Community Forest Associations. Lack of coherence was mainly observed between REDD+ rules and resettlement and agricultural mechanisation policies prescribed in the lands and agriculture policies. Agricultural mechanisation and resettlement policies are synonymous with deforestation especially through illegal and politically motivated agricultural or settlement expansions into Kenya's forest areas. At the local level, REDD + showed potential to positively influence local livelihoods but the aforementioned national institutional gaps and strict carbon standards and prices lead to negative trade-offs between carbon sequestration and alternative livelihoods. The paper advocates for strong multi-stakeholder consultative mechanism so that both Kenyan policy and socioeconomic settings can support effective REDD+ implementation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:有效实施避免因避免的森林砍伐和森林退化而减少排放的规则(REDD +)取决于这些规则与与森林相关的现有部门政策之间的兼容性。本文运用政策文件的内容分析,半结构化访谈和案例研究分析来研究REDD +规则与肯尼亚部门政策和当地社会经济环境之间的相互作用。结果表明,肯尼亚林业部门在借鉴肯尼亚林业部门的政策任务和过去的森林管理经验的基础上,对制定国家REDD +战略进行了有益的协调。然而,由于与林业部门以外的关键部门磋商不力,这种部门主流化已退化为负面的纵向政策互动。土地和农业,并且由于部门间对气候融资的竞争而进一步加剧。对REDD +与部门政策的一致性的分析显示,关于重新造林和权力下放的森林政策与REDD +规则(水平相互作用)是一致的,但是由于这些措施的实施有限(例如,社区森林协会的支持和协调不力。主要在REDD +规则与土地和农业政策中规定的移民安置与农业机械化政策之间缺乏一致性。农业机械化和安置政策是毁林的代名词,尤其是通过非法和出于政治动机的农业或定居点扩展到肯尼亚森林地区。在地方一级,REDD +展示了对当地生计产生积极影响的潜力,但上述国家机构差距以及严格的碳标准和价格导致碳固存与替代生计之间存在负面权衡。本文主张建立强有力的多方利益相关者协商机制,以便肯尼亚的政策和社会经济环境都可以支持有效实施REDD +。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号