首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Is There an Ideal REDD+ Program? An Analysis of Policy Trade-Offs at the Local Level
【2h】

Is There an Ideal REDD+ Program? An Analysis of Policy Trade-Offs at the Local Level

机译:有理想的REDD +程序吗?地方政策权衡的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We use economy-wide simulation methods to analyze the outcome of a simple REDD+ program in a mixed subsistence/commercial-agriculture economy. Alternative scenarios help trace REDD+’s causal chain, revealing how trade-offs between the program’s public and private costs and benefits determine its effectiveness, efficiency and equity (the 3Es). Scenarios reveal a complex relationship between the 3Es not evident in more aggregate analyses. Setting aside land as a carbon sink always influences the productivity of agriculture and its supply of non-market goods and services; but the overall returns to land and labor–which ultimately determine the opportunity cost of enrollment, the price of carbon and the distribution of gains and losses–depend on local conditions. In the study area, market-oriented landowners could enroll 30% of local land into a cost-effective program, but local subsistence demands would raise their opportunity costs as REDD+ unfurls, increasing the marginal cost of carbon. A combination of rent and wage changes would create net costs for most private stakeholders, including program participants. Increasing carbon prices undermines the program’s efficiency without solving its inequities; expanding the program reduces inefficiencies but increases private costs with only minor improvements in equity. A program that prevents job losses could be the best option, but its efficiency compared to direct compensation could depend on program scale. Overall, neither the cost nor the 3Es of alternative REDD+ programs can be assessed without accounting for local demand for subsistence goods and services. In the context of Mexico’s tropical highlands, a moderate-sized REDD+ program could at best have no net impact on rural households. REDD+ mechanisms should avoid general formulas by giving local authorities the necessary flexibility to address the trade-offs involved. National programs themselves should remain flexible enough to adjust for spatially and temporally changing contexts.
机译:我们使用经济范围内的模拟方法来分析一个简单的REDD +计划在混合的生存/商业-农业经济中的结果。替代方案有助于追踪REDD +的因果链,揭示该计划的公共和私人成本与收益之间的取舍如何决定其有效性,效率和公平性(3E)。场景揭示了3E之间的复杂关系,在更全面的分析中没有发现。将土地留作碳汇总会影响农业的生产力及其非市场商品和服务的供应;但是土地和劳动力的总回报取决于当地条件,最终决定了入学的机会成本,碳价以及收益和损失的分配。在研究区域,以市场为导向的土地所有者可以将30%的当地土地纳入成本有效的计划,但是随着REDD +的取消,当地的生存需求会增加他们的机会成本,从而增加碳的边际成本。租金和工资变动的结合会为大多数私人利益相关者(包括计划参与者)创造净成本。碳价上涨会破坏该计划的效率,而不会解决其不平等现象;扩大该计划可以减少效率低下的情况,但会增加私人成本,而权益方面的改善很小。防止失业的计划可能是最好的选择,但与直接补偿相比,其效率可能取决于计划的规模。总体而言,如果不考虑当地对生活用品和服务的需求,则无法评估替代REDD +计划的成本或3E。在墨西哥的热带高地背景下,中等规模的REDD +计划最多不会对农村家庭产生任何净影响。 REDD +机制应通过给予地方当局必要的灵活性来解决所涉及的折衷办法,从而避免采用通用的公式。国家计划本身应保持足够的灵活性,以适应时空变化的环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号