首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >Managing leftovers: Does community forestry increase secure and equitable access to valuable resources for the rural poor?
【24h】

Managing leftovers: Does community forestry increase secure and equitable access to valuable resources for the rural poor?

机译:管理剩余物:社区林业是否为农村贫困人口增加了安全和公平获取宝贵资源的机会?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Community forestry claims to be a means for achieving positive environmental and community outcomes through the transfer of some rights, discretionary powers, and capacity to local communities. It is therefore closely identified with decentralization and devolution. The practical application of community forestry principles on the ground varies, however. The powers (re-)allocated to the community vary by their extent, substance, and content. In many cases, devolution and transfer of rights and decision-making pertains solely to low value forest products and management costs, while higher value and larger benefits accrue to other actors. In this case, institutionalized extraction is formalized and the possibilities of sustainable local management constrained. Since the higher valued resources are excluded from these systems and programs, community forestry becomes in essence an exercise in the "management of leftovers," which is often unsuccessful. In addition, "formalization" of access can add constraints over the lower valued resources that the community had previously enjoyed. The paper details some of these processes in the cases of Nepal, Kenya, and Cameroon. For community forestry to achieve its aspirations, rights over available high value resources need to be effectively transferred to local communities and formalization needs to be limited or empowering. Further research is needed on the extent to which rights have been devolved over real primary resources, and on the institutionalized constraints to full management of primary as well as secondary resources. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:社区林业声称是通过将某些权利,酌处权和能力转让给当地社区来实现积极的环境和社区成果的一种手段。因此,它与权力下放和权力下放密切相关。但是,社区林业原则在实际中的实际应用有所不同。 (重新)分配给社区的权力因其范围,实质和内容而异。在许多情况下,权利的转移和转移以及决策仅与低价值的森林产品和管理成本有关,而其他参与者则可享有更高的价值和更大的利益。在这种情况下,将制度化的采掘形式化,并限制了可持续地方管理的可能性。由于从这些系统和程序中排除了较高价值的资源,因此社区林业从本质上成为“剩余物管理”中的一种练习,通常是不成功的。另外,访问的“形式化”会增加社区先前所享有的价值较低的资源的限制。本文详细介绍了尼泊尔,肯尼亚和喀麦隆的一些案件。为了使社区林业实现其愿望,需要将对可用高价值资源的权利有效地转让给当地社区,并且必须限制正规化或赋予其权力。需要就权利在实际主要资源上的转移程度以及对主要资源和次要资源进行全面管理的制度化限制进行进一步研究。 (C)2015由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号