...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >When peer-reviewed publications are not enough! Delivering science for natural resource management.
【24h】

When peer-reviewed publications are not enough! Delivering science for natural resource management.

机译:当同行评审的出版物还不够时!为自然资源管理提供科学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last century, natural resource management on forest lands has shifted from a singular focus on resource extraction to many foci, such as recreation, tourism, conservation, view-scapes, cultural and spiritual values, sustainability, and other values. As a result, the information needs of land managers must now include social and cultural values. In addition, the public's interest in having greater participation in land management decisions and in generating scientific knowledge has never been greater. The generation of scientific knowledge which is expressed primarily through conventional means - such as peer-reviewed publications targeting academics and technology transfer (e.g., patents, licenses, agreements) primarily for government and industry - does not always satisfy the needs of resource managers and public. In recent decades, there has been rapid growth of methods to help bridge this gap by better connecting new knowledge and knowledge generation with public needs. The U.S. Forest Service is making science delivery as important goal as science creation, including structural institutional changes at the interface among researchers, resource managers, and the public, allocating an appropriate portion of project funding specifically for delivery. The Forest Service is considering increasing its use of citizen science and participatory research - which brings resource managers, decision makers, and the public into the research process to varying extents - as part of the agency's science delivery efforts. Here we explore citizen science and participatory research as possible vehicles to augment existing science delivery efforts from the perspective of a federal land management agency. We found that these mechanisms facilitate public involvement in fundamentally different ways. Depending on the type of research and desired use of research outcomes, either citizen science or participatory research could enhance the use of science in some natural resource management discussions, possibly leading to supportable solutions.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.03.007
机译:在过去的一个世纪中,林地的自然资源管理已从单一的资源开发重点转移到许多重点,例如娱乐,旅游,保护,景观,文化和精神价值,可持续性和其他价值。结果,土地管理者的信息需求现在必须包括社会和文化价值。此外,公众越来越希望更大程度地参与土地管理决策和产生科学知识。主要通过常规手段表达的科学知识的生成(例如主要针对政府和行业的针对学者和技术转让(例如专利,许可,协议)的同行评审出版物)并不总是能够满足资源管理者和公众的需求。在最近的几十年中,通过更好地将新知识和知识生成与公共需求联系起来的方法来弥合这种差距的方法正在迅速增长。美国林业局正在将“科学交付”作为科学创造的重要目标,包括在研究人员,资源管理者和公众之间的接口进行结构性的机构变革,为项目的交付分配适当的项目资金。森林服务部门正在考虑增加对“公民科学”和“参与性研究”的使用,这将使资源管理者,决策者和公众在不同程度上参与研究过程。该机构的科学交付工作。在这里,我们从联邦土地管理机构的角度探讨公民科学和参与性研究,作为可能的手段来增强现有的科学交付工作。我们发现这些机制以根本不同的方式促进了公众的参与。取决于研究的类型和研究成果的预期用途,公民科学或参与性研究都可以在一些自然资源管理的讨论中增强科学的使用,从而可能导致可支持的解决方案。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.forpol.2012.03.007

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号