首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologic Oncology: An International Journal >Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: Does operative start time impact surgical and oncologic outcomes?
【24h】

Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: Does operative start time impact surgical and oncologic outcomes?

机译:子宫内膜癌的微创手术:手术开始时间是否会影响手术和肿瘤学结局?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective Recent literature in ovarian cancer suggests differences in surgical outcomes depending on operative start time. We sought to examine the effects of operative start time on surgical outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer at a single institution between 2000 and 2011. Surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared between patients with an operative start time before noon and those with a surgical start time after noon. Results A total of 380 patients were included in the study (245 with start times before noon and 135 with start times after noon). There was no difference in age (p = 0.57), number of prior surgeries (p = 0.28), medical comorbidities (p = 0.19), or surgical complexity of the case (p = 0.43). Patients with surgery starting before noon had lower median BMI than those beginning after noon, 31.2 vs. 35.3 respectively (p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed for intraoperative complications (4.4% of patients after noon vs. 3.7% of patients before noon, p = 0.79), estimated blood loss (median 100 cc vs. 100 cc, p = 0.75), blood transfusion rates (7.4% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.85), and conversion to laparotomy (12.6% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.10). There was no difference in operative times between the two groups (198 min vs. 216.5 min, p = 0.10). There was no association between operative start time and postoperative non-infectious complications (11.9% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.87), or postoperative infections (17.8% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.78). Length of hospital stay was longer for surgeries starting after noon (median 2 days vs. 1 day, p = 0.005). No differences were observed in rates of cancer recurrence (12.6% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.39), recurrence-free survival (p = 0.97), or overall survival (p = 0.94). Conclusion Our results indicate equivalent surgical outcomes and no increased risk of postoperative complications regardless of operative start time in minimally invasive endometrial cancer staging, despite longer length of hospital stay for surgeries beginning after noon.
机译:目的近期有关卵巢癌的文献表明,手术结局的差异取决于手术的开始时间。我们试图检查进行子宫内膜癌微创手术的患者手术开始时间对手术效果的影响。方法回顾性分析2000年至2011年在同一机构接受子宫内膜癌微创手术的患者。比较手术开始时间为中午之前和手术开始时间为中午之后的患者的手术和肿瘤学结局。结果研究共纳入380例患者(中午开始时间为245例,中午开始时间为135例)。年龄(p = 0.57),既往手术次数(p = 0.28),医疗合并症(p = 0.19)或手术复杂性(p = 0.43)没有差异。中午之前开始手术的患者的BMI中位数低于中午之后开始的患者,分别为31.2和35.3(p = 0.01)。术中并发症(中午后4.4%,中午前3.7%,p = 0.79),估计失血量(中位数100 cc vs. 100 cc,p = 0.75),输血率(分别为7.4%和8.2%,P = 0.85)和开腹手术的转化率(分别为12.6%和7.4%,P = 0.10)。两组之间的手术时间没有差异(198分钟对216.5分钟,p = 0.10)。手术开始时间与术后非感染性并发症(11.9%对11.0%,p = 0.87)或术后感染(17.8%对12.3%,p = 0.78)之间没有关联。中午后开始手术的住院时间更长(中位2天vs. 1天,p = 0.005)。癌症复发率(12.6%vs. 8.8%,p = 0.39),无复发生存率(p = 0.97)或总生存率(p = 0.94)没有差异。结论我们的结果表明,尽管从午后开始进行手术的住院时间较长,但在微创子宫内膜癌分期中,无论手术开始时间如何,手术结果均等,并且没有增加术后并发症的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号