...
首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologic Oncology: An International Journal >Diagnostic performance of the biomarkers HE4 and CA125 in type i and type II epithelial ovarian cancer
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of the biomarkers HE4 and CA125 in type i and type II epithelial ovarian cancer

机译:生物标志物HE4和CA125在I型和II型上皮性卵巢癌中的诊断性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of HE4 and CA125 in patients presenting with suspicious malignant ovarian cysts. We especially wanted to investigate the levels of HE4 and CA125 with regard to the gene and histology-unifying model of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods. Plasma from373women presentingwith a suspiciousmalignant ovarian cystwas collected prior to surgery. Histology, grade, and stage were determined according to FIGO-classification. HE4 and CA125 were analyzed using ELISA, and the markers were evaluated for significance separately and in combination. Receiver operating curves, the area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity were estimated. Results. The combination of HE4 and CA125 resulted in the best diagnostic power in comparing benign tumors to EOC (ROC AUC 0.93, sensitivity 94.4% at 75% specificity) for type II. Diagnostic power in type I (ROC AUC 0.79, sensitivity 61.9% at 75% specificity) was less impressive. In particular, mucinous benign vs. malignant tumors could not significantly be separated by the dual marker combination. Impressively high ROC AUC 0.99 was found for the late stage type II EOC with 100% sensitivity at 75% specificity. Conclusions. HE4 and CA125 have a good ability to diagnose the more aggressive type II tumors but a poor diagnostic ability when patients are presenting with slow-growing type I in the early stage. Our results support the hypothesis that EOC should be looked upon as several different diseases, and thatwe lack biomarkers for subgroups of EOC.
机译:目的。评估HE4和CA125在可疑恶性卵巢囊肿患者中的诊断性能。我们特别想针对I型和II型上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的基因和组织学统一模型研究HE4和CA125的水平。方法。在手术前收集了373名患有可疑恶性卵巢囊肿的女性血浆。组织学,等级和阶段根据FIGO分类确定。使用ELISA分析HE4和CA125,并分别或组合评估标记物的显着性。估计受体工作曲线,曲线下面积,敏感性和特异性。结果。 HE4和CA125的组合在将良性肿瘤与II型EOC(ROC AUC 0.93,灵敏度为75%特异性时为94.4%)进行比较时,具有最佳的诊断能力。 I型诊断能力(ROC AUC 0.79,特异性为75%时灵敏度为61.9%)不那么令人印象深刻。特别地,双重标记物组合不能明显分离粘液性良性与恶性肿瘤。发现晚期II型EOC具有令人印象深刻的高ROC AUC 0.99,灵敏度为100%,特异性为75%。结论HE4和CA125具有良好的诊断更具侵略性的II型肿瘤的能力,但当患者早期出现I型增长缓慢的患者时,诊断能力较差。我们的结果支持以下假设:应将EOC视为几种不同的疾病,并且我们缺乏EOC亚组的生物标记。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号