首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologic Oncology: An International Journal >Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymph node evaluation for cervical cancer via pfannenstiel incision: technique and peri-operative outcomes.
【24h】

Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymph node evaluation for cervical cancer via pfannenstiel incision: technique and peri-operative outcomes.

机译:通过pfannenstiel切口对宫颈癌进行腹膜外主动脉旁淋巴结评估:技术和围手术期结局。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine surgico-pathologic outcomes following extraperitoneal para-aortic lymph node dissection (EPLND) via pfannenstiel compared to paramedian incision prior to radiation in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: At our institution, patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergo, EPLND. From 1990 to 2000, EPLND was performed via paramedian incision (PM) primarily to identify positive para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN). From 2000 to present, a complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed via pfannenstiel incision (PF). Records for all patients undergoing EPLND were reviewed. Pathologic findings, post-operative complications, and time to initiation of radiation (TRT) were abstracted. RESULTS: 93 patients underwent EPLND, 48 via PF and 45 via PM incision. The mean age and body mass index did not differ between the two groups. Stage distribution was similar: IB2 8 vs. 0%; IIB 44 vs. 44%; IIIA/B 35 vs. 44%; IVA 13 vs. 11%, respectively. Positive PALN were identified in 44% of PF patients and 29% of PM patients (p=ns). TRT was not significantly different at 36.4 vs. 28.8 days, respectively. There were more complications among the PF group including cellulitis and lymphocyst formation. Pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scan had positive and negative predictive values of only 86 and 66% for evaluation of PALN involvement. CONCLUSIONS: We present an extraperitoneal method for removal of the pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes with acceptable complications and no significant delay to initiate chemoradiation. Accurate assessment of lymphatic metastases results in modification of the radiation field, which, along with surgical debulking, may impact overall survival.
机译:目的:比较宫颈癌患者放疗前通过腹膜旁切口进行腹膜外主动脉旁淋巴结清扫(EPLND)与腹膜前正中切口相比的手术病理学结果。方法:在我们的机构中​​,患有局部晚期宫颈癌的患者接受了EPLND。从1990年到2000年,EPLND手术是通过正中切口(PM)进行的,主要是为了识别主动脉旁淋巴结阳性(PALN)。从2000年至今,通过pfannenstiel切口(PF)进行了完整的骨盆和主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。审查了所有接受EPLND的患者的记录。摘录了病理结果,术后并发症和放射开始时间(TRT)。结果:93例患者进行了EPLND,48例通过PF,45例通过PM切口。两组之间的平均年龄和体重指数没有差异。阶段分布相似:IB2 8 vs. 0%; IIB 44比44%; IIIA / B 35比44%; IVA 13分别为11%。在44%的PF患者和29%的PM患者中鉴定出PALN阳性(p = ns)。 TRT分别在36.4天和28.8天没有显着差异。 PF组中有更多的并发症,包括蜂窝织炎和淋巴囊形成。治疗前计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描对PALN参与评估的阳性和阴性预测值分别仅为86%和66%。结论:我们提出了一种腹膜外方法,用于切除骨盆和主动脉旁淋巴结,具有可接受的并发症,并且没有显着延迟启动化学放疗。对淋巴结转移的准确评估会导致放射野的改变,再加上手术的减轻,可能会影响整体生存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号