...
首页> 外文期刊>Food Control >Comparative study of different methods for the extraction of DNA from fish species commercially available in South Africa.
【24h】

Comparative study of different methods for the extraction of DNA from fish species commercially available in South Africa.

机译:从南非市售鱼种中提取DNA的不同方法的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study describes the comparison of five DNA extraction methods (urea-SDS-proteinase K; phenol-chloroform; salt extraction; SureFoodReg. PREP Allergen kit and WizardReg. Genomic DNA Purification kit) in terms of their ability to extract high yields of pure, readily amplifiable DNA from the muscle tissue of 29 fish species available in South Africa. Although variations in the yield and purity of extracted DNA were observed between methods, all five methods produced DNA suitable for PCR amplification. Overall, the SureFoodReg. PREP method was of the simplest and least hazardous to perform, extracting significantly (P < 0.05) higher DNA yields than all other methods evaluated.
机译:这项研究描述了5种DNA提取方法的比较(尿素SDS蛋白酶K;苯酚氯仿;盐提取; SureFood Reg。 PREP过敏原试剂盒和Wizard Reg。 基因组DNA纯化试剂盒),它们具有从南非29种鱼类的肌肉组织中提取高产量的纯净,易于扩增的DNA的能力。尽管在两种方法之间观察到提取的DNA的产量和纯度都有变化,但所有五种方法均产生了适合PCR扩增的DNA。总体而言,SureFood Reg。 PREP方法操作起来最简单且危害最小,其DNA提取量要比(i)P <0.05)高得多。所有其他评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号