...
首页> 外文期刊>Food Quality and Preference >Quality perception and acceptability of chicken breast meat labeled with sustainability claims vary as a function of consumers' label-understanding level
【24h】

Quality perception and acceptability of chicken breast meat labeled with sustainability claims vary as a function of consumers' label-understanding level

机译:带有可持续性标签的鸡肉的质量感知和可接受性随消费者标签理解水平的变化而变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Consumers in marketplaces usually view a variety of sustainability-related labels displayed on chicken meat products. However, it is questionable whether consumers understand such label claims and whether their label-understanding level can be effective with respect to quality perception and sensory aspects of the products. This study aimed to determine whether the impacts of sustainability-related labels on quality perception and acceptability of chicken breast meat differ by consumers' label understanding level. Among 110 participants who attended a prior educational intervention regarding label claims, the 33 top-scorers of a survey examining knowledge about label claims participated as a "High Label-Understanding (HLU)" group. Thirty-three counterparts who experienced no educational intervention regarding label claims participated as a "Control (CNTL)" group; both groups were matched in terms of demographic profiles and purchase frequency of chicken-meat products. Participants in both groups evaluated the same four chicken-meat samples labeled with four different label-claims, i.e., "USDA Organic", "No Hormones Added", "USDA Process Verified", and a no-label condition. For the HLU group, perceptions of chicken meat with respect to overall quality, trust in quality, freshness, overall liking, and juiciness differed significantly among the four label-claim conditions. However, no significant differences in this regard were observed in the CNTL group. The label claims-induced intensities of tenderness, juiciness, and chicken flavor of chicken-meat samples did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, the findings demonstrated that the effects of sustainability-related label claims on quality perception and acceptability of chicken meat became significantly more pronounced when consumers understood and trusted the label claims. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:市场上的消费者通常会在鸡肉产品上看到各种与可持续性相关的标签。然而,令人怀疑的是,消费者是否理解此类标签声明,以及他们的标签理解水平在产品的质量感知和感官方面是否有效。这项研究旨在确定与可持续发展相关的标签对鸡胸肉质量感知和可接受性的影响是否因消费者对标签的理解水平而异。在参加过有关标签声明的事先教育干预的110名参与者中,调查有关标签声明知识的调查的33名得分最高的人参加了“高级标签理解(HLU)”小组。没有对标签声明进行任何教育干预的33个对口方作为“对照(CNTL)”组参加;两组的人口统计特征和鸡肉产品的购买频率均匹配。两组中的参与者都对相同的四个鸡肉样品进行了评估,分别标有四个不同的标签要求,即“ USDA有机”,“未添加任何激素”,“ USDA工艺验证”和无标签条件。对于HLU组,在四个标签要求条件之间,鸡肉对整体质量,对质量的信任,新鲜度,整体喜好和多汁感方面存在显着差异。但是,CNTL组在这方面没有观察到显着差异。标签声称诱导的鸡肉肉样品的嫩度,多汁性和鸡肉风味强度在两组之间没有差异。总之,研究结果表明,当消费者理解并信任标签要求时,与可持续性相关的标签要求对鸡肉的质量感知和可接受性的影响变得更加明显。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号