首页> 外文期刊>Food and Drug Law Journal >Resolving international sanitary and phytosanitary disputes in the WTO: lessons and future directions
【24h】

Resolving international sanitary and phytosanitary disputes in the WTO: lessons and future directions

机译:解决世贸组织中的国际卫生和植物检疫争端:经验教训和未来方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

International sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) standards have taken center stage at the World Trade Organization (WTO), in both the standard-setting and dispute settlement arenas. For example, the labeling, safety, and environmental impacts of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are becoming among the most contentious trade issues of 2000. Do GMOs threaten human health or life? Do they threaten animal health or life? If science is inconclusive on either of these scores, should an importing country be permitted to ban their entry? Even if science shows that GMOs are safe, should an importing country be permitted to require labeling of products that contain GMOs so that consumers can decide whether or not to purchase such products? In the absence of scientific support indicating that GMOs pose a health risk, would such a labeling requirement be an impermissible restriction on trade because it would be the equivalent of a "Warning: This Product May Be Hazardous to Your Health" sticker?
机译:国际卫生和植物检疫(SPS)标准已在世界贸易组织(WTO)的标准制定和争端解决领域占据中心地位。例如,转基因生物(GMO)的标签,安全和环境影响正成为2000年最具争议的贸易问题之一。GMO是否威胁着人类健康或生命?它们威胁动物健康或生命吗?如果科学在这两个方面都没有定论,是否应允许进口国禁止其进入?即使科学证明转基因生物是安全的,是否应允许进口国要求对包含转基因生物的产品加标签,以便消费者可以决定是否购买此类产品?在缺乏科学证据表明转基因生物会危害健康的情况下,这样的标签要求是对贸易的不允许限制,因为它等同于“警告:该产品可能危害您的健康”标签?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号