...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of ophthalmology >Intraocular pressure adjusted for central corneal thickness as a screening tool for open-angle glaucoma in an at-risk population.
【24h】

Intraocular pressure adjusted for central corneal thickness as a screening tool for open-angle glaucoma in an at-risk population.

机译:调节中心角膜厚度的眼压,作为高危人群开角型青光眼的筛查工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) adjusted for central corneal thickness (CCT) screening for open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in an at-risk population. STUDY DESIGN: Community-based screening clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and forty-nine persons of black race, or >50 years of age, or with a positive family history of glaucoma. METHODS: Ophthalmological examination including Goldmann applanation tonometry, ultrasonographic corneal pachymetry, and visual field testing. Glaucomatous optic nerve damage with visual field loss was the gold standard. IOP was adjusted for CCT based on 3 nomograms. Results were compared with screening using unadjusted IOP. Outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs), as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios. RESULTS: No significant difference in CCT was found between those with glaucoma (560 [SD 37] microm, n = 31) and those without (557 [SD 35] microm, n = 233). Screening adjusted IOPs for glaucoma with an IOP > 21 mm Hg resulted in PPVs of 23.8% to 25% and NPVs of 89.3% to 89.6%, similar to preadjustment values. Areas under the ROC curves varied from 0.544 to 0.571 post adjustment from the initial value of 0.574. CONCLUSIONS: IOP adjusted for CCT is unlikely to improve tonometry as a screening tool for OAG in an at-risk population.
机译:目的:评估高危人群眼内压(IOP),以调整中心角膜厚度(CCT)筛查开角型青光眼(OAG)。研究设计:基于社区的筛查诊所。参加者:349名黑人,年龄大于50岁,或有青光眼家族史。方法:眼科检查包括戈德曼压平眼压计,超声角膜测厚计和视野测试。伴有视野丧失的青光眼性视神经损伤是金标准。根据3列线图调整了IOP的CCT。将结果与使用未经调整的IOP进行筛查相比较。结果指标包括敏感性,特异性,受体工作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积,阳性和阴性预测值(PPV和NPV)以及阳性和阴性似然比。结果:青光眼患者(560 [SD 37]微米,n = 31)和无青光眼患者(557 [SD 35]微米,n = 233)的CCT差异均无统计学意义。与IOP≥21 mm Hg相比,筛查经调整的IOP的青光眼会导致PPV为23.8%至25%,NPV为89.3%至89.6%。调整后,ROC曲线下的面积从0.544变为0.571,而初始值为0.574。结论:针对CCT进行调整的IOP不太可能改善作为高危人群OAG筛查工具的眼压计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号