首页> 外文期刊>Fluid Power Journal >Sonic Conductance for Everyone
【24h】

Sonic Conductance for Everyone

机译:所有人的音速电导

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Let us start by having a closer look at Cv (ANSI T3.21.3) and the implications we encounter when using this standard to determine the size of a pneumatic valve. Coefficient of flow, or simply Cv, is a standard applied to determine the flow capacity of components using water as the test fluid. It also defines a pressure drop of 1 psi (1-2%) across the test object. To eventually get an airflow rate (Q), it is necessary to apply a conversion factor. Based on its inherent properties, it is apparent that this method will not provide an accurate result. In particular, the low-pressure drop is a problem, since pneumatic circuits frequently operate with a pressure drop across the valve seat up to 15% of the inlet pressure. I know there have been countless valves selected based on the Cv data, and they probably worked just fine. The truth is, there are critical applications out there that require a more refined selection procedure, rather than chronically over-sizing components "just to be on the safe side." When it comes to sizing, I like to say: "As small as possible and as big as necessary!" This also makes sense from an economical and ecological point of view.
机译:让我们从仔细研究Cv(ANSI T3.21.3)以及使用该标准确定气动阀尺寸时遇到的含义开始。流量系数,或简称为Cv,是用于使用水作为测试流体来确定组件的流量的标准。它还定义了整个测试对象的1 psi(1-2%)的压降。为了最终获得气流速率(Q),必须应用转换系数。基于其固有特性,很明显,该方法将无法提供准确的结果。特别是低压降是一个问题,因为气动回路经常在整个阀座上的压降高达进气压力的15%的情况下运行。我知道根据Cv数据选择了无数个阀门,它们可能工作得很好。事实是,有一些关键的应用程序需要更精细的选择程序,而不是“为了安全起见”长期地使组件过大。在调整大小时,我喜欢说:“尽可能小,尽可能大!”从经济和生态的角度来看,这也是有道理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号