...
首页> 外文期刊>Fishery Bulletin >Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls.
【24h】

Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls.

机译:大型捕捞活动对缅因州西部湾底栖生物群落的影响:刺网和水獭拖网的影响得到恢复。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The recovery of benthic communities inside the western Gulf of Maine fishing closure area was evaluated by comparing invertebrate assemblages at sites inside and outside of the closure four to six years after the closure was established. The major restriction imposed by the closure was a year-round prohibition of bottom gillnets and otter trawls. A total of 163 seafloor sites (~ half inside and half outside the closure) within a 515-km2 study area were sampled with some combination of Shipek grab, Wildco box corer, or underwater video. Bottom types ranged from mud (silt and clay) to boulders, and the effects of the closure on univariate measures (total density, biomass, taxonomic richness) of benthos varied widely among sediment types. For sites with predominantly mud sediments, there were mixed effects on inside and outside infauna and no effect on epifauna. For sites with mainly sand sediments, there were higher density, biomass, and taxonomic richness for infauna inside the closure, but no significant effects on epifauna. For sites dominated by gravel (which included boulders in some areas), there were no effects on infauna but strong effects on epifaunal density and taxonomic richness. For fishing gear, the data indicated that infauna recovered in sand from the impacts of otter trawls operated inside the closure but that they did not recover in mud, and that epifauna recovered on gravel bottoms from the impact of gillnets used inside the closure. The magnitudes of impact and recovery, however, cannot be inferred directly from our data because of a confounding factor of different fishing intensities outside the closure for a direct comparison of preclosure and postclosure data. The overall negative impact of trawls is likely underestimated by our data, whereas the negative impact of gillnets is likely overestimated.
机译:缅因州西部捕捞禁区西部底栖动物群落的恢复情况,是通过比较在禁区建立后四到六年内在禁区内外的无脊椎动物种群进行评估的。关闭所施加的主要限制是全年禁止使用底部刺网和水獭拖网。在515 km 2 研究区域内,总共对163个海底站点(封闭区内部一半,外部封闭区一半)进行了采样,并结合了Shipek抓斗,Wildco盒式取芯器或水下视频。底部类型从泥浆(淤泥和粘土)到巨石不等,并且封盖对底栖动物单变量测量(总密度,生物量,分类学丰富度)的影响在沉积物类型之间差异很大。对于主要沉积物为泥沙的地点,对内部和外部信息系统的影响是混合的,而对表位动物的影响则没有。对于主要为沙沉积物的地点,封盖内的地上动物有较高的密度,生物量和分类学丰富度,但对表皮动物没有显着影响。对于以砾石为主的地点(某些地区包括巨石),对疫情没有影响,但对表生密度和分类学丰富度影响很大。对于渔具,数据表明,在封闭物内部操作的水獭拖网的影响中,信息动物在沙子中恢复了,但在泥土中却没有恢复,并且在封闭物内部使用的刺网的影响,在砾石底部恢复了动物生态系统。然而,由于直接关闭前和关闭后数据的比较,封闭区外不同捕捞强度的混杂因素,无法直接从我们的数据中得出影响和恢复的幅度。我们的数据可能低估了拖网的总体负面影响,而刺网的负面影响则可能被高估了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号