首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls
【2h】

Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls

机译:大型捕捞活动对缅因州西部湾底栖生物群落的影响:刺网和水獭拖网的影响中恢复

摘要

The recovery of benthic communities inside the western Gulfudof Maine fishing closure area was evaluated by comparing invertebrate assemblages at sites inside and outside of the closure four to six years after the closure was established. The major restriction imposed by the closureudwas a year-round prohibition of bottom gillnets and otter trawls. A total of 163 seafloor sites (~half inside and half outside the closure) within a 515-km2 study area were sampled with some combination of Shipek grab, Wildco box corer, or underwater video. Bottom types ranged from mud (silt and clay) to boulders, and the effects of the closure on univariate measures (total density, biomass, taxonomicudrichness) of benthos varied widely among sediment types. For sites with predominantly mud sediments, there were mixed effects on inside and outside infauna and no effect onudepifauna. For sites with mainly sand sediments, there were higher density, biomass, and taxonomic richness for infauna inside the closure, but no significant effects on epifauna. For sites dominated by gravel (which included boulders in some areas), there were no effects on infauna but strong effects on epifaunal density and taxonomic richness. For fishing gear, the data indicated that infauna recovered inudsand from the impacts of otter trawls operated inside the closure but that they did not recover in mud, and that epifauna recovered on gravel bottoms from the impact of gillnets used inside the closure. The magnitudes of impact and recovery, however, cannot be inferred directly from ouruddata because of a confounding factor of different fishing intensities outside the closure for a direct comparison ofudpreclosure and postclosure data. The overall negative impact of trawls is likely underestimated by our data,udwhereas the negative impact of gillnets is likely overestimated.
机译:通过在关闭建立四到六年后,比较缅因州西部海湾缅因州乌德捕鱼禁区内底栖动物群落的恢复情况,以比较封闭区内外地点的无脊椎动物种群。封锁造成的主要限制是全年禁止底部刺网和水獭拖网。在515平方公里的研究区域内,总共采样了163个海底场所(封闭区内约一半,封闭区外约一半),并结合了Shipek抓斗,Wildco取芯器或水下视频进行了采样。底部类型从泥浆(淤泥和黏土)到巨石不等,并且封盖对底栖生物单变量测量(总密度,生物量,分类学富集度)的影响在沉积物类型之间差异很大。对于主要是泥沙沉积的地点,对内部和外部信息系统的影响是混合的,对 udepifauna没有影响。对于主要为沙沉积物的地点,封盖内的动物有较高的密度,生物量和分类学丰富度,但对表生动物没有显着影响。对于以砾石为主的地点(某些地区包括巨石),对疫情没有影响,但对表生密度和分类学丰富度影响很大。对于渔具,数据表明,在封闭物内部操作的水獭拖网的影响中,infauna恢复了 udsanduds,但它们并未在泥土中恢复,并且在封闭物内部使用的刺网的影响下,粪便动物在砾石底部恢复了。但是,由于直接关闭封闭前和封闭后数据的封闭区域以外不同捕捞强度的混杂因素,无法直接从我们的 uddata推断影响和恢复的幅度。我们的数据可能低估了拖网的总体负面影响,而刺网的负面影响可能被高估了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号