...
首页> 外文期刊>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology: Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Opthalmologie >Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
【24h】

Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机译:经结膜无缝玻璃体切除术与20规格玻璃体切除术进行玻璃体视网膜手术:荟萃分析的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy is appealing to vitreoretinal surgeons around the world. However, its use versus 20-gauge vitreoretinal surgery is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and functional outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery.Data sources, including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, were searched to identify potentially relevant randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. The primary factors included patients' discomfort, operating time and early postoperative complications. Visual acuity and surgically induced astigmatism were chosen as secondary outcomes.A total of 471 participants with 479 eyes in eight trials between 2005 and 2011 were analyzed. Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy was associated with significantly fewer patients suffering from postoperative discomfort at 1 day (odds ratio [OR] 0.07; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 0.49; p = 0.007) and 7 days (OR 0.14; 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.73; p = 0.02) follow-up, and was more effective in reducing surgically induced astigmatism (mean difference -0.23D; 95 % CI -0.31 to -0.15; p < 0.00001) compared to 20-gauge vitrectomy. The sutureless group achieved shorter wound opening (mean difference -1.97 minutes; 95 % CI -2.69 to -1.25; p < 0.00001) as well as wound closure time (mean difference -4.55 minutes; 95 % CI -5.43 to -3.66; p < 0.00001), but the overall surgery time was comparable (mean difference -0.14 minutes; 95 % CI -3.52 to 3.24; p = 0.93). There were no significant differences in the complication rates between the two groups with the exception of postoperative hypotony, which was more likely with the sutureless group (OR 3.73; 95 % CI 1.43 to 9.76; p = 0.007).According to the present data, transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy offered significantly less postoperative discomfort and decreased surgically induced astigmatism without increasing the risk of vision-threatening complications. Further trials with contemporary equipment and larger sample size are suggested to confirm this conclusion.
机译:经结膜无缝玻璃体切除术吸引了全世界的玻璃体视网膜外科医生。但是,它与20规格玻璃体视网膜手术的使用仍存在争议。这项荟萃分析的目的是比较经结膜无缝玻璃体切割术与20规格玻璃体切割术进行玻璃体视网膜手术的安全性和功能结果。随机对照试验。使用RevMan 5.0软件进行荟萃分析。主要因素包括患者不适,手术时间和术后早期并发症。选择视敏度和手术引起的散光作为次要结局.2005年至2011年之间的八项试验中,共分析471名参与者的479只眼。经结膜无缝玻璃体切除术与术后1天(奇数比[OR] 0.07; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.01至0.49; p = 0.007)和7天(OR 0.14; 95%CI 0.03)的术后不适患者明显减少相关至0.73; p = 0.02)随访,与20规格玻璃体切除术相比,在减少手术引起的散光方面更有效(平均差异-0.23D; 95%CI -0.31至-0.15; p <0.00001)。无缝合组的伤口张开时间较短(平均差异为-1.97分钟; 95%CI为-2.69至-1.25; p <0.00001)以及伤口闭合时间(平均差异为-4.55分钟; 95%CI为-5.43至-3.66; p <0.00001),但总体手术时间相当(平均差异-0.14分钟; 95%CI -3.52至3.24; p = 0.93)。除术后低渗外,两组的并发症发生率无显着差异,无缝线组的发生率更高(OR 3.73; 95%CI 1.43至9.76; p = 0.007)。经结膜无缝玻璃体切除术可显着减少术后不适,并减少手术引起的散光,而不会增加威胁视力的并发症的风险。建议使用现代设备和更大的样本量进行进一步试验,以证实这一结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号