...
【24h】

Recent studies provide an updated clinical perspective on blue light-filtering IOLs.

机译:最近的研究为滤蓝光的人工晶体提供了更新的临床观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recent reviews of blue light-filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) have stated their potential risks for scotopic vision and circadian photoentrainment. Some authors have challenged the rationale for retinal photoprotection that these IOLs might provide. Our objective is to address these issues by providing an updated clinical perspective based on the results of the most recent studies. METHODS: This article evaluates the currently available published papers assessing the potential risks and benefits of blue light-filtering IOLs. It summarizes the results of seven clinical and two computational studies on photoreception, and several studies related to retinal photoprotection, all of which were not available in the previous reviews. These results provide a clinical risk/benefit analysis for an updated review for these IOLs. RESULTS: Most clinical studies comparing IOLs with and without the blue light-filtering feature have found no difference in clinical performance for; visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color vision, or glare. For blue light-filtering IOLs, three comparative clinical studies have shown improved contrast sensitivity and glare reduction; but one study, while it showed satisfactory overall color perception, demonstrated some compromise in mesopic comparative blue color discrimination. Comparative results of two recent clinical studies have also shown improved performance for simulated driving under glare conditions and reduced glare disability, better heterochromatic contrast threshold, and faster recovery from photostress for blue light-filtering IOLs. Two computational and five clinical studies found no difference in performance between IOLs with or without blue light-filtration for scotopic vision performance and photo entrainment of the circadian rhythm. The rationale for protection of the pseudophakic retina against phototoxicity is discussed with supporting results of the most recent computational, in-vitro, animal, clinical, and epidemiological investigations. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides an updated clinical perspective which suggests the selection of blue light-filtering IOLs for patients of any age, but especially for pediatric and presbyopic lens exchange patients with a longer pseudophakic life. Without clinically substantiated potential risks, these patients should experience the benefit of overall better quality of vision, reduced glare disability at least in some conditions, and better protection against retinal phototoxicity and its associated potential risk for AMD.
机译:背景:最近对滤蓝光的人工晶状体(IOL)的评论表明,它们存在暗视和昼夜节律的潜在风险。一些作者对这些IOL可能提供的视网膜光保护原理提出了质疑。我们的目标是通过根据最新研究结果提供更新的临床观点来解决这些问题。方法:本文评估了当前可用的发表论文,这些论文评估了滤蓝光的人工晶体的潜在风险和收益。它总结了关于光感受的七项临床研究和两项计算研究的结果,以及与视网膜光保护有关的几项研究,所有这些在以前的综述中都没有。这些结果为这些IOL的最新综述提供了临床风险/获益分析。结果:大多数比较具有和不具有蓝光过滤功能的IOL的临床研究均发现,其临床性能没有差异。视敏度,对比敏感度,色觉或眩光。对于滤蓝光的IOL,三项比较临床研究表明,对比度灵敏度得到了改善,眩光减少了。但是一项研究虽然显示出令人满意的整体色彩感知能力,但在介观比较性蓝色辨别力方面却表现出一定的折衷。两项最新临床研究的比较结果还显示,在眩光条件下模拟驾驶的性能得到改善,眩光残疾降低,异色对比度阈值更好,并且滤蓝光IOL的光应力恢复更快。两项计算和五项临床研究发现,无论有无蓝光滤过的IOL,其暗视功能和昼夜节律的光合反应的性能无差异。讨论了保护伪晶状体视网膜免受光毒性的基本原理,并结合了最新的计算,体外,动物,临床和流行病学研究的结果。结论:该分析提供了更新的临床观点,其建议对于任何年龄的患者,特别是对于假晶状体寿命较长的小儿和老花眼晶状体置换患者,选择滤蓝光的IOL。如果没有临床上可证实的潜在风险,这些患者应受益于总体上更好的视力质量,至少在某些情况下减少眩光残疾以及更好地保护视网膜免受光毒性及其相关的AMD潜在风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号