...
首页> 外文期刊>Ear and hearing. >Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.
【24h】

Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

机译:在评估正常听觉,噪声掩蔽的正常听觉和人工耳蜗听众对口语单词识别能力时的一些注意事项。 I:响应格式的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present studies was to assess the validity of using closed-set response formats to measure two cognitive processes essential for recognizing spoken words---perceptual normalization (the ability to accommodate acoustic-phonetic variability) and lexical discrimination (the ability to isolate words in the mental lexicon). In addition, the experiments were designed to examine the effects of response format on evaluation of these two abilities in normal-hearing (NH), noise-masked normal-hearing (NMNH), and cochlear implant (CI) subject populations. DESIGN: The speech recognition performance of NH, NMNH, and CI listeners was measured using both open- and closed-set response formats under a number of experimental conditions. To assess talker normalization abilities, identification scores for words produced by a single talker were compared with recognition performance for items produced by multiple talkers. To examine lexical discrimination, performance for words that are phonetically similar to many other words (hard words) was compared with scores for items with few phonetically similar competitors (easy words). RESULTS: Open-set word identification for all subjects was significantly poorer when stimuli were produced in lists with multiple talkers compared with conditions in which all of the words were spoken by a single talker. Open-set word recognition also was better for lexically easy compared with lexically hard words. Closed-set tests, in contrast, failed to reveal the effects of either talker variability or lexical difficulty even when the response alternatives provided were systematically selected to maximize confusability with target items. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, although closed-set tests may provide important information for clinical assessment of speech perception, they may not adequately evaluate a number of cognitive processes that are necessary for recognizing spoken words. The parallel results obtained across all subject groups indicate thatNH, NMNH, and CI listeners engage similar perceptual operations to identify spoken words. Implications of these findings for the design of new test batteries that can provide comprehensive evaluations of the individual capacities needed for processing spoken language are discussed.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估使用封闭式回答格式来测量识别语音的两个关键过程的有效性-感知规范化(适应语音变化的能力)和词汇辨别力(在心理词典中隔离单词的能力)。此外,还设计了实验来检查响应格式对正常听觉(NH),噪声蒙蔽正常听觉(NMNH)和人工耳蜗(CI)受试者群体中这两种能力评估的影响。设计:在许多实验条件下,使用开放式和封闭式响应格式来测量NH,NMNH和CI听众的语音识别性能。为了评估说话者的标准化能力,将单个说话者产生的单词的识别分数与多个说话者产生的项目的识别性能进行比较。为了检查词汇歧视,将在语音上与许多其他单词(硬词)相似的单词的性能与在语音上相似的竞争者(简单单词)很少的项目的得分进行比较。结果:与由单个说话者说所有单词的情况相比,当在具有多个说话者的列表中产生刺激时,所有受试者的开放式单词识别能力明显较差。与词汇难的单词相比,开集单词识别在词汇上更容易。相比之下,即使系统地选择了提供的备选答案以最大程度地与目标项目混淆,封闭式测试也无法揭示说话者变异性或词汇难度的影响。结论:这些发现表明,尽管封闭式测试可能为临床上的言语感知评估提供重要信息,但它们可能无法充分评估认知口语所需的许多认知过程。在所有主题组中获得的并行结果表明,NH,NMNH和CI听众会进行类似的感知操作来识别口头单词。讨论了这些发现对设计新型测试电池的意义,这些测试电池可以对处理口语所需的各个能力进行全面评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号