...
首页> 外文期刊>Growth hormone and IGF research: Official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society >Insulin glargine is more potent in activating the human IGF-I receptor than human insulin and insulin detemir.
【24h】

Insulin glargine is more potent in activating the human IGF-I receptor than human insulin and insulin detemir.

机译:甘精胰岛素比人胰岛素和地特胰岛素更有效地活化人IGF-I受体。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether human insulin (HI) and insulin analogues differ in their ability to activate the human IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR), the human insulin receptor A (IR-A) and the human insulin receptor B (IR-B) in vitro. METHODS: HI, short-acting insulin analogues (insulin aspart; insulin lispro) and long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine; insulin detemir) were compared by using kinase receptor activation (KIRA) bioassays specific for IGF-IR, IR-A or IR-B, respectively. These assays quantify ligand activity by measuring receptor auto-phosphorylation upon ligand binding. HI and insulin analogues were tested in a range from 0.1 to 100 nM. RESULTS: Short-acting analogues: Overall, short-acting insulin analogues did not differ substantially from HI, nor from each other. Insulin lispro was slightly more potent than HI and insulin aspart in activating the IGF-IR, only reaching statistical significance at 100 nM (p<0.01). Long-acting analogues: At <10 nM insulin glargine was as potent as HI in activating the IRs and IGF-IR. At 10-100 nM insulin glargine was significantly more potent than HI in activating the IR-B (p<0.05) and IGF-IR (p<0.001). Insulin glargine was more potent than insulin detemir in activating all three receptors (p<0.001). Insulin detemir was less potent than HI in activating the IRs at 1-10 nM (p<0.01) and IGF-IR at >1 nM (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin glargine was more potent in activating the IGF-IR than HI and insulin detemir. Since KIRA bioassays do not mimic the exact in vivo situation, further research is needed to find out whether our data have implications for clinical use of insulin glargine.
机译:目的:研究人胰岛素(HI)和胰岛素类似物在激活人IGF-I受体(IGF-IR),人胰岛素受体A(IR-A)和人胰岛素受体B(IR- B)体外。方法:通过对IGF-IR,IR-A或IR特异性的激酶受体激活(KIRA)生物测定法比较了HI,短效胰岛素类似物(门冬胰岛素;赖脯胰岛素)和长效胰岛素类似物(甘精胰岛素;地特米尔胰岛素)。 IR-B。这些测定法通过测量配体结合后的受体自身磷酸化来定量配体活性。 HI和胰岛素类似物的测试范围为0.1至100 nM。结果:短效胰岛素类似物:总体而言,短效胰岛素类似物与HI并没有实质性差异。赖脯胰岛素在激活IGF-IR方面比HI和门冬胰岛素稍强,仅在100 nM时才达到统计学意义(p <0.01)。长效类似物:在小于10 nM的条件下,甘精胰岛素在激活IR和IGF-IR方面与HI一样有效。在10-100 nM时,甘精胰岛素在激活IR-B(p <0.05)和IGF-IR(p <0.001)方面比HI更有效。甘精胰岛素在激活所有三个受体上比地特胰岛素更有效(p <0.001)。地特胰岛素在1-10 nM(p <0.01)和IGF-IR> 1 nM(p <0.05)激活IR方面不如HI有效。结论:甘精胰岛素在激活IGF-IR方面比HI和地特胰岛素更为有效。由于KIRA生物测定法无法模拟准确的体内情况,因此需要进一步研究以发现我们的数据是否对甘精胰岛素的临床使用产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号