首页> 外文期刊>Facial plastic surgery: FPS >Financial analysis of technology acquisition using fractionated lasers as a model.
【24h】

Financial analysis of technology acquisition using fractionated lasers as a model.

机译:使用分级激光器作为模型的技术获取的财务分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ablative fractional lasers are among the most advanced and costly devices on the market. Yet, there is a dearth of published literature on the cost and potential return on investment (ROI) of such devices. The objective of this study was to provide a methodological framework for physicians to evaluate ROI. To facilitate this analysis, we conducted a case study on the potential ROI of eight ablative fractional lasers. In the base case analysis, a 5-year lease and a 3-year lease were assumed as the purchase option with a Dollars 0 down payment and 3-month payment deferral. In addition to lease payments, service contracts, labor cost, and disposables were included in the total cost estimate. Revenue was estimated as price per procedure multiplied by total number of procedures in a year. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for variability in model assumptions. Based on the assumptions of the model, all lasers had higher ROI under the 5-year lease agreement compared with that for the 3-year lease agreement. When comparing results between lasers, those with lower operating and purchase cost delivered a higher ROI. Sensitivity analysis indicates the model is most sensitive to purchase method. If physicians opt to purchase the device rather than lease, they can significantly enhance ROI. ROI analysis is an important tool for physicians who are considering making an expensive device acquisition. However, physicians should not rely solely on ROI and must also consider the clinical benefits of a laser.
机译:烧蚀分数激光器是市场上最先进,最昂贵的设备之一。但是,关于此类设备的成本和潜在投资回报率(ROI)的文献很少。这项研究的目的是为医生提供一种评估ROI的方法学框架。为了促进此分析,我们对八种烧蚀性分数激光的潜在投资回报率进行了案例研究。在基本案例分析中,假设以5美元的租赁期和3年的租赁期为首付为0美元且推迟了3个月付款的购买选项。除租赁付款外,服务合同,人工成本和一次性用品也包括在总成本估算中。估计收入为每个程序的价格乘以一年中的程序总数。进行敏感性分析以说明模型假设中的变异性。根据模型的假设,与3年租赁协议相比,在5年租赁协议下所有激光器的ROI更高。在比较激光器之间的结果时,具有较低运行和购买成本的激光器提供了更高的投资回报率。敏感性分析表明该模型对购买方法最敏感。如果医生选择购买设备而不是租赁设备,那么他们可以大大提高ROI。对于正在考虑进行昂贵的设备购置的医生来说,ROI分析是重要的工具。但是,医生不应仅依靠ROI,还必须考虑激光的临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号