...
首页> 外文期刊>Gut: Journal of the British Society of Gastroenterology >Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review
【24h】

Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review

机译:优化结直肠癌筛查的接受度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The study aims to review available evidence concerning effective interventions to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening acceptance. We performed a literature search of randomised trials designed to increase individuals' use of CRC screening on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Small (<= 100 subjects per arm) studies and those reporting results of interventions implemented before publication of the large faecal occult blood test trials were excluded. Interventions were categorised following the Continuum of Cancer Care and the PRECEDE-PROCEED models and studies were grouped by screening model (opportunistic vs organised). Multifactor interventions targeting multiple levels of care and considering factors outside the individual clinician control, represent the most effective strategy to enhance CRC screening acceptance. Removing financial barriers, implementing methods allowing a systematic contact of the whole target population, using personal invitation letters, preferably signed by the reference care provider, and reminders mailed to all non-attendees are highly effective in enhancing CRC screening acceptance. Physician reminders may support the diffusion of screening, but they can be effective only for individuals who have access to and make use of healthcare services. Educational interventions for patients and providers are effective, but the implementation of organisational measures may be necessary to favour their impact. Available evidence indicates that organised programmes allow to achieve an extensive coverage and to enhance equity of access, while maximising the health impact of screening. They provide at the same time an infrastructure allowing to achieve a more favourable cost-effectiveness profile of potentially effective strategies, which would not be sustainable in opportunistic settings.
机译:这项研究旨在回顾有关增加大肠癌(CRC)筛查接受率的有效干预措施的现有证据。我们对旨在增加个人对PubMed,Embase,Cochrane系统评价数据库和疗效评价数据库的CRC筛查的使用的随机试验进行了文献检索。小型(每臂<= 100个受试者)研究以及报告大型粪便潜血试验之前发表的干预措施结果的研究被排除在外。干预按照癌症护理连续性和PRECEDE-PROCEED模型进行分类,并按筛查模型对研究进行分组(机会性或有组织性)。针对多种护理水平并考虑个别临床医生无法控制的因素的多因素干预措施是提高CRC筛查接受率的最有效策略。消除财务障碍,采用允许最好地由参考护理提供者签名的个人邀请函,以及允许所有非与会者参加的提醒,可以有效地与整个目标人群进行系统联系,从而提高对CRC筛查的接受度。医师提醒可能支持筛查的传播,但它们仅对可获得并使用医疗服务的个人有效。对患者和提供者的教育干预是有效的,但是可能需要采取组织措施来增强其影响。现有证据表明,有组织的计划可以扩大覆盖范围并提高获取的公平性,同时最大程度地提高筛查的健康影响。它们同时提供了一种基础结构,可以实现对潜在有效策略的更有利的成本效益状况,而这在机会主义环境中是无法持续的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号