...
首页> 外文期刊>Gut: Journal of the British Society of Gastroenterology >Levofloxacin-based and clarithromycin-based triple therapies as first-line and second-line treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomised comparative trial with crossover design.
【24h】

Levofloxacin-based and clarithromycin-based triple therapies as first-line and second-line treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomised comparative trial with crossover design.

机译:基于左氧氟沙星和克拉霉素的三联疗法作为幽门螺杆菌感染的一线和二线治疗:一项具有交叉设计的随机比较试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a levofloxacin-based regimen as the first-line treatment and a clarithromycin-based regimen as the second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the eradication rates of these two regimens using different administration sequences. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomised to receive LAL: levofloxacin (750 mg once a day), amoxicillin (1000 mg twice a day) and lansoprazole (30 mg twice a day) for 7 days, or CAL: clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day), amoxicillin (1000 mg twice a day) and lansoprazole (30 mg twice a day) for 7 days. Patients with positive [(13)C]urea breath test after treatment were retreated with the rescue regimen in a crossover manner for 10 days. RESULT: When used as first-line treatment (n=432), the eradication rates of LAL (n=217) and CAL (n=215) were 74.2 and 83.7% (p=0.015) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 80.1 and 87.4% (p=0.046) in the per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. When used as second-line treatment, the eradication rates of LAL (n=26) and CAL (n=40) were 76.9 and 60% (p=0.154) in the ITT analysis, and 80 and 61.5% (p=0.120) in the PP analysis, respectively. The overall eradication rates of CAL followed by LAL were better than the reverse sequence in both the ITT analysis (93% vs 85.3%, p=0.01) and the PP analysis (97.6% vs 92.5%, p=0.019). The eradication rate was significantly lower in the presence of levofloxacin resistance in the LAL group (50% vs 84.4%, p=0.018) and clarithromycin resistance in the CAL group (44.4% vs 90.7%, p=0.002). CONCLUSION: CAL achieved a higher eradication rate than LAL as the first-line treatment, but not as the second-line treatment. The strategy of using CAL as the initial treatment and LAL as the rescue regimen achieved higher eradication rates than the reverse sequence.
机译:背景:基于左氧氟沙星的方案作为一线治疗的疗效和基于克拉霉素的方案作为对幽门螺杆菌感染的二线治疗的疗效仍然未知。这项研究的目的是使用不同的给药顺序来评估这两种方案的根除率。方法:将符合条件的患者随机分组接受LAL:左氧氟沙星(每天750 mg),阿莫西林(每天两次1000 mg)和兰索拉唑(每天两次30 mg)每天7天,或CAL:克拉霉素(每天两次500 mg) ),阿莫西林(每天两次1000毫克)和兰索拉唑(每天两次30毫克)共7天。治疗后[(13)C]尿道呼气试验阳性的患者,采用抢救方案以交叉方式复治10天。结果:当用作一线治疗时(n = 432),LAL(n = 217)和CAL(n = 215)的根除率分别为74.2和83.7%(p = 0.015)。 ITT)分析,以及按协议(PP)分析分别为80.1和87.4%(p = 0.046)。当用作二线治疗时,在ITT分析中,LAL(n = 26)和CAL(n = 40)的根除率分别为76.9和60%(p = 0.154),以及80和61.5%(p = 0.120)在PP分析中分别进行。在ITT分析(93%vs 85.3%,p = 0.01)和PP分析(97.6%vs 92.5%,p = 0.019)中,CAL和LAL的总根除率均优于反向序列。 LAL组对左氧氟沙星的耐药率(50%比84.4%,p = 0.018)和克拉霉素对克拉霉素的耐药率(44.4%vs 90.7%,p = 0.002)明显降低。结论:作为一线治疗,CAL比LAL具有更高的根除率,但作为二线治疗却没有。与反向序列相比,使用CAL作为初始治疗和使用LAL作为抢救方案的策略根除率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号