首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Assessing efficacy of non-opioid analgesics in experimental pain models in healthy volunteers: an updated review.
【24h】

Assessing efficacy of non-opioid analgesics in experimental pain models in healthy volunteers: an updated review.

机译:在健康志愿者的实验性疼痛模型中评估非阿片类镇痛药的疗效:最新评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIM: Experimental pain models may help to evaluate the mechanisms of analgesics and target the clinical indications for their use. This review, the second in a series of two, addresses how the efficacy of non-opioid analgesics have been assessed in human volunteers using experimental pain models. METHODS: A literature search was completed for randomized controlled studies that included human experimental pain models, healthy volunteers and non-opioid analgesics. RESULTS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs worked against various types of acute pain as well as in hyperalgesia. Analgesia from paracetamol was difficult to detect in experimental pain and the pain needed to be assessed with very sensitive methods like evoked brain potentials. The N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists exemplified by ketamine generally needed strong, long-lasting or repeated pain in the skin for detectable analgesia, whereas pain in muscle and viscera generally was more easily attenuated. Gabapentin worked well in several models, particularly those inducing hyperalgesia, whereas lamotrigine was weak in modulation of experimental pain. Imipramine attenuated pain in most experimental models, whereas amitriptyline had weaker effects. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol attenuated pain in only a few models. CONCLUSIONS: Pain induction and assessment are very important for the sensitivity of the pain models. Generally, experimental pain models need to be designed with careful consideration of the pharmacological mechanisms and pharmacokinetics of analgesics. The drawback with the different study designs is also discussed. This knowledge can aid the decisions that need to be taken when designing experimental pain studies for compounds entering Phase I and II trials.
机译:目的:实验性疼痛模型可能有助于评估止痛药的作用机制,并针对其使用的临床适应症。这篇综述是两个系列文章中的第二篇,它探讨了如何使用实验性疼痛模型在人类志愿者中评估非阿片类镇痛药的疗效。方法:文献检索完成了包括人实验疼痛模型,健康志愿者和非阿片类镇痛药在内的随机对照研究。结果:非甾体类抗炎药可治疗各种类型的急性疼痛以及痛觉过敏。对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛很难在实验性疼痛中检测到,并且需要使用诱发脑电势等非常敏感的方法来评估疼痛。以氯胺酮为例的N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸拮抗剂通常需要在皮肤中产生强烈,持久或反复的疼痛才能检测出镇痛效果,而肌肉和内脏的疼痛通常更容易减轻。加巴喷丁在几种模型中均表现良好,尤其是诱发痛觉过敏的模型,而拉莫三嗪在调节实验性疼痛方面作用较弱。在大多数实验模型中,丙咪嗪可减轻疼痛,而阿米替林的作用较弱。 Delta-9-四氢大麻酚仅在少数模型中减轻了疼痛。结论:疼痛的诱导和评估对于疼痛模型的敏感性非常重要。通常,需要仔细考虑止痛药的药理机制和药代动力学来设计实验性疼痛模型。还讨论了不同研究设计的缺点。当为进入I和II期试验的化合物设计实验性疼痛研究时,此知识可以帮助做出需要做出的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号