首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO2 under a Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi-arid environment
【24h】

Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO2 under a Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi-arid environment

机译:在半干旱环境中进行自由空气CO2浓缩(FACE)实验和建模的情况下,小麦生长,谷物产量和水分利用对CO2升高的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The response of wheat crops to elevated CO2 (eCO(2)) was measured and modelled with the Australian Grains Free-Air CO2 Enrichment experiment, located at Horsham, Australia. Treatments included CO2 by water, N and temperature. The location represents a semi-arid environment with a seasonal VPD of around 0.5 kPa. Over 3years, the observed mean biomass at anthesis and grain yield ranged from 4200 to 10200kgha(-1) and 1600 to 3900kgha(-1), respectively, over various sowing times and irrigation regimes. The mean observed response to daytime eCO(2) (from 365 to 550molmol(-1) CO2) was relatively consistent for biomass at stem elongation and at anthesis and LAI at anthesis and grain yield with 21%, 23%, 21% and 26%, respectively. Seasonal water use was decreased from 320 to 301mm (P=0.10) by eCO(2), increasing water use efficiency for biomass and yield, 36% and 31%, respectively. The performance of six models (APSIM-Wheat, APSIM-Nwheat, CAT-Wheat, CROPSYST, OLEARY-CONNOR and SALUS) in simulating crop responses to eCO(2) was similar and within or close to the experimental error for accumulated biomass, yield and water use response, despite some variations in early growth and LAI. The primary mechanism of biomass accumulation via radiation use efficiency (RUE) or transpiration efficiency (TE) was not critical to define the overall response to eCO(2). However, under irrigation, the effect of late sowing on response to eCO(2) to biomass accumulation at DC65 was substantial in the observed data (similar to 40%), but the simulated response was smaller, ranging from 17% to 28%. Simulated response from all six models under no water or nitrogen stress showed similar response to eCO(2) under irrigation, but the differences compared to the dryland treatment were small. Further experimental work on the interactive effects of eCO(2), water and temperature is required to resolve these model discrepancies.
机译:小麦作物对升高的CO2(eCO(2))的响应已通过位于澳大利亚霍舍姆的澳大利亚谷物自由空气CO2富集实验进行了测量和建模。处理包括水,氮和温度下的二氧化碳。该位置代表半干旱环境,季节性VPD约为0.5 kPa。在3年中,在不同的播种时间和灌溉方式下,观察到的平均花期生物量和籽粒平均生物量分别为4200至10200kgha(-1)和1600至3900kgha(-1)。观察到的对白天eCO(2)的平均响应(从365到550molmol(-1)CO2)在茎伸长和花期时的生物量和花期时的LAI相对一致,在谷物和产量上分别为21%,23%,21%和26 %, 分别。 eCO(2)将季节性用水量从320毫米减少到301毫米(P = 0.10),从而提高了生物质和产量的用水效率,分别为36%和31%。六个模型(APSIM-小麦,APSIM-Nwheat,CAT-小麦,CROPSYST,OLEARY-CONNOR和SALUS)在模拟农作物对eCO(2)的响应方面的性能相似,并且在累积生物量,产量的实验误差范围内或接近实验误差。和水分利用响应,尽管早期生长和LAI有所不同。通过辐射利用效率(RUE)或蒸腾效率(TE)进行生物量积累的主要机制对于定义对eCO(2)的整体响应不是至关重要的。但是,在灌溉条件下,在观察到的数据中,后期播种对eCO(2)对生物量在DC65积累的响应的影响很大(接近40%),但模拟响应较小,范围为17%至28%。所有六个模型在无水或无氮胁迫下的模拟响应显示,在灌溉条件下对eCO(2)的响应相似,但与旱地处理相比差异很小。为了解决这些模型差异,需要对eCO(2),水和温度的相互作用进行进一步的实验工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号