首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration
【24h】

Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration

机译:估计年度土壤呼吸的间隙填充策略和误差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Soil respiration (Rsoil) is one of the largest CO2 fluxes in the global carbon (C) cycle. Estimation of annual Rsoil requires extrapolation of survey measurements or gap filling of automated records to produce a complete time series. Although many gap filling methodologies have been employed, there is no standardized procedure for producing defensible estimates of annual Rsoil. Here, we test the reliability of nine different gap filling techniques by inserting artificial gaps into 20 automated Rsoil records and comparing gap filling Rsoil estimates of each technique to measured values. We show that although the most commonly used techniques do not, on average, produce large systematic biases, gap filling accuracy may be significantly improved through application of the most reliable methods. All methods performed best at lower gap fractions and had relatively high, systematic errors for simulated survey measurements. Overall, the most accurate technique estimated Rsoil based on the soil temperature dependence of Rsoil by assuming constant temperature sensitivity and linearly interpolating reference respiration (Rsoil at 10 degrees C) across gaps. The linear interpolation method was the second best-performing method. In contrast, estimating Rsoil based on a single annual Rsoil Tsoil relationship, which is currently the most commonly used technique, was among the most poorly-performing methods. Thus, our analysis demonstrates that gap filling accuracy may be improved substantially without sacrificing computational simplicity. Improved and standardized techniques for estimation of annual Rsoil will be valuable for understanding the role of Rsoil in the global C cycle.
机译:土壤呼吸(土壤)是全球碳(C)循环中最大的CO2通量之一。估算年度土壤残留量需要外推调查测量结果或自动记录的空缺以产生完整的时间序列。尽管已经采用了许多填补空白的方法,但是还没有标准化的程序可以得出可靠的年度Rsoil估算值。在这里,我们通过将人工间隙插入20条自动Rsoil记录中,并将每种技术的间隙填充Rsoil估计值与测量值进行比较,来测试9种不同间隙填充技术的可靠性。我们表明,尽管最常用的技术平均而言不会产生较大的系统偏差,但是通过应用最可靠的方法可以显着提高间隙填充的准确性。所有方法在较低的间隙分数下效果最佳,并且在模拟调查测量中具有相对较高的系统误差。总体而言,最准确的技术是通过假设土壤温度对土壤的温度依赖性来估算土壤土壤温度,方法是假设温度敏感性恒定并在间隙之间线性插值参考呼吸(10摄氏度土壤土壤温度)。线性插值方法是第二好的方法。相比之下,基于性能最差的方法之一是根据当前每年最常用的技术来估计Rsoil,这是目前最常用的技术。因此,我们的分析表明,在不牺牲计算简便性的前提下,可以大幅提高间隙填充的准确性。改进的标准化Rsoil估算技术对于了解Rsoil在全球C周期中的作用将非常有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号