首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Triple antiplatelet therapy vs. dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an evidence-based approach to answering a clinical query
【24h】

Triple antiplatelet therapy vs. dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an evidence-based approach to answering a clinical query

机译:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的三联抗血小板治疗与二联抗血小板治疗:回答临床询问的循证方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS:Outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare metal stents (BMS) have not been evaluated separately for specific dual and triple antiplatelet agent use.The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether triple antiplatelet therapy (combination of clopidogrel, aspirin and cilostazol) has any advantage in efficacy compared with standard dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) in patients undergoing PCI.METHODS:Electronic and printed sources were searched till May 2008 for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of cilostazol in combination with aspirin and clopidogrel. Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
机译:目的:尚未对使用药物洗脱支架(DES)和裸金属支架(BMS)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者的特定双重和三重抗血小板药使用情况进行评估。本荟萃分析的目的是为了确定在接受PCI治疗的患者中,三联抗血小板疗法(氯吡格雷,阿司匹林和西洛他唑的组合)与标准双联抗血小板疗法(阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)相比在疗效上是否有任何优势。西洛他唑联合阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的临床试验(RCT)。计算具有95%置信区间(CIs)的合并加权平均差(WMD)和合并优势比(OR)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号