首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >The impact of new insights and revised practice guidelines on prescribing drugs in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
【24h】

The impact of new insights and revised practice guidelines on prescribing drugs in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

机译:新见解和经修订的操作准则对治疗2型糖尿病的处方药的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of new insights and revised guidelines on initial and follow-up treatment with antihyperglycaemic drugs over the period 1998-2003. METHODS: The InterAction Database (IADB), which contains pharmacy dispensing data from 53 community pharmacies in the Northern and Eastern part of the Netherlands, was used in this study. Prevalence and incidence rates of oral antihyperglycaemic drug use were calculated for each year. Follow-up treatment was compared for two cohorts of initial users of oral antihyperglycaemic drugs, starting treatment either 1 year before or 1 year after guideline revision. RESULTS: The prevalence and incidence rate of oral antihyperglycaemic drug use increased over the study period from 1.8% to 2.4% (P < 0.001) and 0.3% to 0.4% (P = 0.04). The proportion of metformin as initial treatment increased rapidly in the observation period from 14% to 50% (P < 0.001). Initial users of metformin in 2000 received additional treatment with a sulphonylurea in the follow-up period less often compared with those who started metformin in 1998 (46%vs. 60%, P < 0.004). In contrast, initial users of sulphonylurea in 2000 received additional treatment with metformin more often compared with those who started a sulphonylurea in 1998 (42%vs. 36%, P < 0.008). The new drugs, thiazolidinediones and meglitinides, were seldom used as initial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: New insights and the revision of the practice guideline were followed by a significant increase in both initial and follow-up treatment with metformin among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
机译:目的:这项研究的目的是调查新的见解和修订后的指南对1998年至2003年期间使用降血糖药进行初始和后续治疗的影响。方法:本研究使用了InterAction数据库(IADB),该数据库包含来自荷兰北部和东部的53家社区药房的药房配药数据。每年计算口服降血糖药的使用率和发生率。比较了两个最初使用口服降血糖药的人群的随访治疗方法,即在指南修订前一年或一年后开始治疗。结果:口服抗高血糖药的使用率和发生率在研究期间从1.8%增加到2.4%(P <0.001),从0.3%增加到0.4%(P = 0.04)。二甲双胍作为初始治疗的比例在观察期内从14%迅速增加到50%(P <0.001)。与1998年开始使用二甲双胍的患者相比,2000年开始使用二甲双胍的患者在随访期内接受磺酰脲类药物治疗的频率更低(46%比60%,P <0.004)。相比之下,与1998年开始使用磺脲类药物的患者相比,2000年使用磺脲类药物的最初用户更频繁地接受二甲双胍的治疗(42%比36%,P <0.008)。很少将新药噻唑烷二酮和美格替尼用于初始治疗。结论:新的见解和实践指南的修订之后,在2型糖尿病患者中,二甲双胍的初始和后续治疗均显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号