...
首页> 外文期刊>Geriatric nursing >Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.
【24h】

Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.

机译:Braden量表对长期护理机构老年人的压疮风险的预测有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Brazil. The determination of the cutoff score for the Brazilian population is important for the comparison between Brazilian and international studies and establishment of guidelines for prevention of pressure ulcers in our health care facilities. This is the first study of its kind in Brazil. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study conducted with 233 LTCF residents aged 60 and over who underwent complete skin examination and Braden Scale rating every 2 days for 3 months. Two groups of patients were considered: the total group (N = 233) and risk group (n = 94, total scores < or =18). Data from the first and last assessments were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. The best results were obtained for the total group, with cutoff scores of 18 and 17, sensitivity of 75.9% and 74.1%, specificity of 70.3% and 75.4%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.79 and 0.81 at the first and last assessments, respectively. For the risk group, the cutoff scores of 16 (first assessment) and 13 (last assessment) were associated with a smaller AUC-ROC and, therefore, lower predictive accuracy. The Braden Scale showed good predictive validity in elderly LTCF residents.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估Braden量表对预测巴西长期护理机构(LTCF)老年人的压疮风险的预测有效性。确定巴西人口的临界分值对于巴西和国际研究之间的比较以及在我们的医疗机构中建立预防压疮的指南很重要。这是巴西的同类研究之一。这是一项针对前瞻性队列研究的二级分析,该研究针对233名60岁及60岁以上的LTCF居民,每2天进行了完整的皮肤检查和Braden Scale评分,为期3个月。考虑两组患者:总组(N = 233)和风险组(n = 94,总分<或= 18)。分析来自第一次和最后一次评估的数据的敏感性,特异性和似然比。整个组获得了最佳结果,截断分数分别为18和17,敏感性为75.9%和74.1%,特异性为70.3%和75.4%,接受者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC-ROC)为0.79和7。第一次和最后一次评估分别为0.81。对于风险组,临界得分为16(第一次评估)和13(最后评估)与较小的AUC-ROC相关,因此预测准确性较低。 Braden量表对老年LTCF居民显示出良好的预测效度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号