...
首页> 外文期刊>Genome research >Human-specific insertions and deletions inferred from mammalian genome sequences.
【24h】

Human-specific insertions and deletions inferred from mammalian genome sequences.

机译:从哺乳动物基因组序列推断出人特异性插入和缺失。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It has been suggested that insertions and deletions (indels) have contributed to the sequence divergence between the human and chimpanzee genomes more than do nucleotide changes (3% vs. 1.2%). However, although there have been studies of large indels between the two genomes, no systematic analysis of small indels (i.e., indels 840,000 "small" indels, which affect >7000 UCSC-annotated human genes (>11,000 transcripts). These indels, however, amount to only approximately 0.21% sequence change in the human lineage for the regions compared, whereas in pseudogenes indels contribute to a sequence divergence of 1.40%, suggesting that most of the indels that occurred in genic regions have been eliminated. Functional analysis reveals that the genes whose coding exons have been affected by human-specific indels are enriched in transcription and translation regulatory activities but are underrepresented in catalytic and transporter activities, cellular and physiological processes, and extracellular region/matrix. This functional bias suggests that human-specific indels might have contributed to human unique traits by causing changes at the RNA and protein level.
机译:已经提出,插入和缺失(indels)比核苷酸改变对人类和黑猩猩基因组之间的序列差异的贡献更大(3%对1.2%)。但是,尽管已经研究了两个基因组之间的大插入缺失,但尚未发表对小插入缺失(即,插入缺失 84万个“小”插入缺失,影响了> 7000个UCSC注释的人类基因(> 11,000个转录本)。然而,与这些区域相比,这些插入缺失仅占人类谱系中序列变化的约0.21%,而在假基因中,插入缺失导致序列差异为1.40%,这表明发生在基因区的大多数插入缺失均已被消除。功能分析显示,其编码外显子已受到人类特异性插入缺失影响的基因在转录和翻译调节活性中富集,但在催化和转运蛋白活性,细胞和生理过程以及细胞外区域/基质中却不足以表达。这种功能性偏倚表明,人类特异性插入缺失可能通过引起RNA和蛋白质水平的变化而促进了人类独特的性状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号