首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Baseline estimates of soil organic carbon by proximal sensing: Comparing design-based, model-assisted and model-based inference
【24h】

Baseline estimates of soil organic carbon by proximal sensing: Comparing design-based, model-assisted and model-based inference

机译:基于近端传感的土壤有机碳基线估算:比较基于设计,基于模型辅助和基于模型的推断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For baselining and to assess changes in soil organic carbon (C) we need efficient soil sampling designs and methods for measuring C stocks. Conventional analytical methods are time-consuming, expensive and impractical, particularly for measuring at depth. Here we demonstrate the use of proximal soil sensors for estimating the total soil organic C stocks and their accuracies in the 0-10 cm, 0-30 cm and 0-100 cm layers, and for mapping the stocks in each of the three depth layers across 2837 ha of grazing land. Sampling locations were selected by probability sampling, which allowed design-based, model-assisted and model-based estimation of the total organic C stock in the study area. We show that spectroscopic and gamma attenuation sensors can produce accurate measures of soil organic C and bulk density at the sampling locations, in this case every 5 cm to a depth of 1 m. Interpolated data from a mobile multisensor platform were used as covariates in Cubist to map soil organic C. The Cubist map was subsequently used as a covariate in the model-assisted and model-based estimation of the total organic C stock. The design-based, model-assisted and model-based estimates of the total organic C stocks in the study area were similar. However, the variances of the model-assisted and model-based estimates were smaller compared to those of the design-based method. The model-based method produced the smallest variances for all three depth layers. Maps helped to assess variability in the C stock of the study area. The contribution of the spectroscopic model prediction error to our uncertainty about the total soil organic C stocks was relatively small. We found that in soil under unimproved pastures, remnant vegetation and forests there is good rationale for measuring soil organic C beyond the commonly recommended depth of 0-30 cm. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:为了确定基线并评估土壤有机碳(C)的变化,我们需要有效的土壤采样设计和方法来测量碳库。常规的分析方法耗时,昂贵且不切实际,特别是对于深度测量而言。在这里,我们演示了使用近端土壤传感器估算0-10 cm,0-30 cm和0-100 cm层中的土壤有机碳总量及其精度,并绘制了三个深度层中每个层的储量跨越2837公顷的牧场。通过概率抽样选择抽样地点,这可以对研究区域的总有机碳库进行基于设计,模型辅助和基于模型的估计。我们表明,光谱和伽马衰减传感器可以在采样位置(在这种情况下,每5厘米到1 m的深度)可以精确测量土壤有机碳和容重。来自移动多传感器平台的插值数据在Cubist中用作协变量,以绘制土壤有机碳的图。Cubist图随后在总有机碳储量的模型辅助和基于模型的估算中用作协变量。研究区域中基于设计,模型辅助和基于模型的总有机碳储量估算值相似。但是,与基于设计的方法相比,基于模型的估计和基于模型的估计的方差较小。基于模型的方法对所有三个深度层产生最小的方差。地图有助于评估研究区域碳储量的变异性。光谱模型预测误差对我们对土壤有机碳总量的不确定性的贡献相对较小。我们发现,在未经改良的草场,残留的植被和森林下的土壤中,有一个很好的理由可以测量通常建议的深度0-30厘米以外的土壤有机碳。官方版权(C)2015,由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号