首页> 外文期刊>Gear technology >Comparison of Rating Trends in AGMA Versus ISO
【24h】

Comparison of Rating Trends in AGMA Versus ISO

机译:AGMA与ISO评级趋势比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the international gear business, the ISO 6336 rating standard is gaining more acceptance across many industries and markets. This is important to U.S. gear manufacturers as it can affect not only the ratings coexisting designs that form the basis for a company's standard line of units, but can also dictate the basic design philosophy of sizing a new gear design. Using an AGMA-developed software package to compare the ratings for gears by the ISO and AGMA methods shows how the AGMA and ISO standards differ as various parameters are changed. The gear parameters studied include profile shift/addendum modification coefficient changes, helix angle changes and pressure angle changes. Since this comparison is for rating trends instead of actual ratings, they were normalized for each rating method. The article indicates how each rating standard could alter the design for the same gearbox.
机译:在国际齿轮行业中,ISO 6336评级标准正在许多行业和市场中获得越来越多的认可。这对美国齿轮制造商来说很重要,因为它不仅会影响构成公司标准单位线基础的共存设计的额定值,而且还会决定确定新齿轮设计尺寸的基本设计理念。使用AGMA开发的软件包通过ISO和AGMA方法比较齿轮的等级,可以显示随着各种参数的变化,AGMA和ISO标准的差异。研究的齿轮参数包括轮廓偏移/齿顶修正系数变化,螺旋角变化和压力角变化。由于此比较是针对评级趋势而不是实际评级,因此针对每种评级方法将其标准化。该文章指出了每个评级标准如何改变同一变速箱的设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号