...
首页> 外文期刊>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde >Prospective Comparison of Loop Excision under Colposcopic Guidance versus Vitom Guidance
【24h】

Prospective Comparison of Loop Excision under Colposcopic Guidance versus Vitom Guidance

机译:阴道镜下引导与Vi骨引导下环切除术的前瞻性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Aim of the study was to compare the quality of loop excision using a colposcope with results using the VITOM system. Results compared included cervical volume removed, in-tra- and postoperative complications, and positive resection margins.Methods: A total of 200 patients with histologi-cally confirmed high-grade cervical premalig-nant lesions, persistent atypical cytological results and/or suspicious colposcopic findings, and cytological and histological discrepancies were included in the study. In transformation zone type 1 (Tl) only a superficial cone biopsy was done, in zones type 2 and 3 (T2 and T3) a superficial outside cone biopsy or a deeper inside cone biopsy were done respectively, followed by endo-cervical curettage. Volume of removed tissue, complications, and positive resection margins were compared for the colposcopy and the VITOM groups.
机译:背景:该研究的目的是将使用阴道镜的环行切除术的质量与使用VITOM系统的结果进行比较。所比较的结果包括清除宫颈体积,术中和术后并发症以及切缘阳性。方法:总共200例经组织学证实为宫颈癌前病变,持续的非典型细胞学结果和/或可疑阴道镜检查的患者研究结果以及细胞学和组织学差异。在类型1的转化区(T1)中,仅进行了浅锥形活检,在类型2和3(T2和T3)中,分别进行了浅表外锥形活检或较深的内部锥形活检,然后进行宫颈内刮除术。比较阴道镜和VITOM组的切除组织体积,并发症和阳性切除切缘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号