首页> 外文期刊>Genetic epidemiology. >Evaluating cost efficiency of SNP chips in genome-wide association studies.
【24h】

Evaluating cost efficiency of SNP chips in genome-wide association studies.

机译:在全基因组关联研究中评估SNP芯片的成本效率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have recently emerged as a major approach to gene discovery for many complex diseases. Since GWA scans are expensive, cost efficiency is an important factor to consider in study design. However, it often requires extensive and time-consuming computer simulations to compare cost efficiency across different single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips. Here, we propose two simulation-free approaches to cost efficiency comparisons across SNP chips. In the first method, the overall power under a given disease model is calculated for each SNP chip and various sample sizes. Then SNP chips can be compared with respect to the sample sizes required to achieve the same level of power. In the second method, for a desired level of genomic coverage, the effective r(2) threshold values are calculated for each SNP chip. Since r(2) is inversely proportional to the sample size to achieve the same power, the required sample sizes can then be compared among SNP chips. These two methodsare complementary to each other. The first approach provides direct power comparisons, but it requires information on disease model and may not be reliable for SNP chips that contain many non-HapMap SNPs. The second approach allows sample size comparisons based on the coverage of SNP chips, and it can be modified for SNP chips that contain non-HapMap SNPs. These methods are particularly relevant for large epidemiological studies in which enough subjects are available for GWA screening and follow-up stages. We illustrate these approaches using five currently available whole genome SNP chips.
机译:全基因组协会(GWA)研究最近已经成为许多复杂疾病的基因发现的主要方法。由于GWA扫描价格昂贵,因此成本效率是研究设计中要考虑的重要因素。但是,通常需要进行大量且耗时的计算机模拟才能比较不同单核苷酸多态性(SNP)芯片之间的成本效率。在这里,我们提出了两种无需仿真的方法来比较SNP芯片之间的成本效率。在第一种方法中,针对每个SNP芯片和各种样本大小,计算给定疾病模型下的总功效。然后,可以将SNP芯片与达到相同功率水平所需的样本数量进行比较。在第二种方法中,对于所需的基因组覆盖水平,为每个SNP芯片计算有效的r(2)阈值。由于r(2)与样本大小成反比,以实现相同的功效,因此可以在SNP芯片之间比较所需的样本大小。这两种方法是互补的。第一种方法提供了直接的功率比较,但是它需要有关疾病模型的信息,并且对于包含许多非HapMap SNP的SNP芯片可能并不可靠。第二种方法允许基于SNP芯片的覆盖范围进行样本大小比较,并且可以针对包含非HapMap SNP的SNP芯片进行修改。这些方法与大型流行病学研究特别相关,在大型流行病学研究中,有足够的受试者可用于GWA筛查和随访阶段。我们使用五个当前可用的全基因组SNP芯片说明了这些方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号