...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >Intranasal fentanyl and intravenous morphine did not differ for pain relief in children with closed long-bone fractures
【24h】

Intranasal fentanyl and intravenous morphine did not differ for pain relief in children with closed long-bone fractures

机译:鼻内芬太尼和静脉内吗啡在闭合性长骨骨折患儿缓解疼痛方面没有区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

QUESTIONIn children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute long-bone fractures, is intranasal fentanyl equivalent to intravenous (IV) morphine for pain control?METHODSDesign: randomised controlled trial. Allocation: {concealed}.Blinding: blinded (patients, {clinicians, data collectors, outcome assessors, data analysts, and monitoring committee}).Follow-up period: 30 minutes after initial analgesic administration.Setting: tertiary paediatric ED in a hospital in Australia. Patients: 67 patients 7-15 years of age (mean age 11 y, 79% with fractures of the radius or ulna), who presented to the ED with clinically deformed, closed, long-bone fractures. Exclusion criteria were narcotic analgesia within 4 hours of arrival, significant head injury, allergy to opiates, nasal blockage or trauma, and inability to perform pain scoring. Intervention: 33 patients were given intranasal fentanyl (weight-determined initial dose: 21-30 kg, 30mug; 31-40 kg, 45 mug; 41-50 kg, 60 mug) plus IV normal saline (placebo). 34 patients were given IV morphine (initial dose: 21-30 kg, 2 mg; 31-40 kg, 3 mg; 41-50 kg, 4 mg) plus intranasal placebo. Additional fentanyl (15 mug) or morphine (1 mg) could be given every 5 minutes until pain relief, patient refusal, or maximum number of doses ( = initial dose). Outcomes: patient-reported pain (100 mm unmarked visual analogue scale [VAS], 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain) assessed at baseline and 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after analgesic administration; and adverse effects, including sedation and respiratory or cardiovascular effects. 32 patients per group were required to detect a 13 mm change in pain score (baseline 80 mm, power 90%, alpha = 0.05).
机译:在急诊急诊出现急长骨骨折的儿童中,鼻内芬太尼等效于静脉内吗啡用于镇痛吗?方法设计:随机对照试验。分配:{隐蔽}。盲:盲人(患者,{临床医生,数据收集者,结果评估者,数据分析人员和监测委员会}}。随访时间:首次镇痛镇静后30分钟。在澳大利亚。患者:67名7至15岁的患者(平均年龄11岁,%骨或尺骨骨折为79%),他们因临床变形,闭合性长骨骨折向ED提出。排除标准为到达后4小时内的麻醉性镇痛,严重的头部受伤,对阿片类药物的过敏,鼻塞或外伤以及无法进行疼痛评分。干预:33例患者接受鼻内芬太尼(体重确定的初始剂量:21-30公斤,30马克杯; 31-40公斤,45马克杯; 41-50公斤,60马克杯)加上静脉注射生理盐水(安慰剂)。 34例患者接受了吗啡静脉注射(初始剂量:21-30 kg,2 mg; 31-40 kg,3 mg; 41-50 kg,4 mg)加鼻内安慰剂。可以每5分钟服用一次芬太尼(15杯)或吗啡(1毫克),直至疼痛缓解,患者拒绝服用或达到最大剂量(=初始剂量)为止。结果:在基线时以及止痛药施用后5、10、20和30分钟评估的患者报告的疼痛(100 mm无标记视觉模拟评分[VAS],0 =无疼痛,100 =最严重疼痛);不良反应,包括镇静,呼吸或心血管疾病。每组32名患者需要检测13毫米的疼痛评分变化(基线80毫米,功效90%,α= 0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号