首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >Review: spontaneous or induced abortion is not associated with development of breast cancer
【24h】

Review: spontaneous or induced abortion is not associated with development of breast cancer

机译:评论:自然流产或人工流产与乳腺癌的发展无关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The idea that breast cancer risk is increased among women who have had abortions is an important scientific theory that has been sensationalised by both pro-abortion and anti-abortion activists, who are willing to use a very mixed body of evidence for their own purposes.There are plausible biological mechanisms that might explain a relation between both spontaneous and induced abortions and the development of breast cancer. Regardless of the political context, it is important to understand the causes of this disease that might be amenable to behavioural change or public policy initiatives. However, this area of research has been plagued by methodological problems, including the problem of asking women to report induced abortions that may have occurred at a time when such procedures were illegal. Even very small differences in reporting between women with and without breast cancer could have led to the modest increases in risk reported in several studies.The reanalysis of data from 53 studies of abortion and breast cancer by the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer gets around many of the methodological shortcomings of earlier studies and meta-analyses by focusing on countries with liberal abortion laws and providing a separate analysis of 13 studies where information on abortions was recorded prospectively. This subgroup of studies included data on 44 000 women and found no effect of either spontaneous or induced abortion on breast cancer risk. This is strong evidence that no causal relation exists of either clinical or public health significance. Interestingly, although the prospective studies showed no effect of induced abortions on breast cancer, the reanalysed data from 39 retrospective studies showed a slightly increased risk-evidence of a systematic recall bias in these studies.Clinically, this study suggests that women who experience spontaneous abortion and women who are considering induced abortion can be reassured that no sound medical evidence exists that they will be at increased risk of developing breast cancer. With the publication of this methodologically sound and comprehensive reanalysis, it is hoped that resources available for breast cancer research can be redirected towards more fruitful lines of research into preventable causes.
机译:在堕胎妇女中增加乳腺癌风险的想法是一个重要的科学理论,被赞成堕胎和反对堕胎的活动家所激动,她们愿意为自己的目的使用非常混合的证据。有可能的生物学机制可以解释自然流产和人工流产与乳腺癌发展之间的关系。无论政治背景如何,重要的是要了解这种疾病的可能因行为改变或公共政策倡议而引起的原因。但是,这一领域的研究受到方法论问题的困扰,其中包括要求妇女报告在这种程序不合法时可能发生的人工流产的问题。几项研究中报告的有无乳腺癌女性之间的即使很小的差异也可能导致风险的适度增加。乳腺癌荷尔蒙因素协作组对53项堕胎和乳腺癌研究的数据进行了重新分析着眼于具有宽松堕胎法律的国家,并单独分析了13项前瞻性记录堕胎信息的研究,从而解决了早期研究和荟萃分析的许多方法学缺陷。该亚组研究包括44000名妇女的数据,发现自然流产或人工流产对乳腺癌风险没有影响。有力的证据表明,不存在具有临床或公共卫生意义的因果关系。有趣的是,尽管前瞻性研究显示人工流产对乳腺癌没有影响,但来自39项回顾性研究的重新分析数据显示,这些研究中系统性回忆偏倚的风险证据略有增加。考虑到人工流产的妇女可以放心,没有可靠的医学证据证明她们患乳腺癌的风险会增加。随着该方法论上的,合理的,全面的重新分析的出版,人们希望可以将可用于乳腺癌研究的资源重定向到针对可预防原因的更加富有成果的研究领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号