...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >Immediate removal of indwelling catheters after hysterectomy was not associated with adverse outcomes
【24h】

Immediate removal of indwelling catheters after hysterectomy was not associated with adverse outcomes

机译:子宫切除术后立即拆除留置导管与不良预后无关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Indwelling urinary catheters are frequently used after urogenital surgery to monitor urine output and to prevent urinary retention.Although there seems to be no clinical uncertainty about the need for an empty bladder before surgery, controversy arises about the ideal time to remove the catheter. Removal of indwelling catheters tends to be based on personal preference and tradition rather than evidence from research.The study by Dunn et al was carefully designed, with appropriate and clinically relevant outcomes. The major findings were that patients who had immediate removal of indwelling catheters had no adverse outcomes and reported significantly less pain than patients who had their catheters removed after 24 hours.These findings are particularly relevant to health professionals in gynaecology, but should also raise questions for health professionals working in other surgical services. Urinary catheterisation is not a harmless procedure. Urinary tract infections account for about 40% of hospital acquired infections, and 80% of urinary tract infections acquired in hospital are associated with urinary catheters.2 Such infections not only prolong hospital stay and are expensive to treat but also cause unpleasant symptoms.3 Health professionals are guided in practice by the ethical principle of "doing no harm." The findings of the study by Dunn ef al will support practitioners who want to protect and work in partnership with their patients. Immediate postoperative removal of catheters is likely to restore dignity and control to patients. If catheterisation cannot be avoided, nurses must aim to remove the catheter as soon as possible to alleviate unnecessary pain and other risks to patient safety.
机译:泌尿生殖器手术后经常使用导尿管监测尿量并防止尿retention留。尽管在手术前是否需要排空膀胱似乎没有临床不确定性,但关于取出导管的理想时间仍存在争议。移除留置导管往往是基于个人喜好和传统,而不是来自研究的证据。Dunn等人的研究是经过精心设计的,具有适当的临床相关结果。主要发现是,立即拔除留置导管的患者没有不良后果,并且报告的疼痛明显少于24小时后拔除导管的患者。这些发现与妇科卫生专业人员特别相关,但也应引起以下问题从事其他外科服务的卫生专业人员。导尿不是无害的过程。泌尿道感染约占医院获得性感染的40%,而在医院获得的泌尿道感染中,有80%与导尿管有关。2这种感染不仅延长了住院时间,治疗费用昂贵,而且会引起不适的症状。3健康专业人士在实践中应遵循“不伤害”的道德原则。 Dunn ef al的研究结果将为希望保护患者并与患者合作的医生提供支持。术后立即拔出导管可能会恢复患者的尊严并控制患者。如果无法避免导尿,则护士必须以尽快拆除导尿管为目标,以减轻不必要的疼痛和对患者安全的其他风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号