...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science: International Journal of Experimental Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics >Measurements of rising velocity of a small bubble in a stagnant fluid in one- and two-component systems
【24h】

Measurements of rising velocity of a small bubble in a stagnant fluid in one- and two-component systems

机译:一组分和二组分系统中停滞流体中小气泡上升速度的测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite its apparent simplicity, the problem of accurate determination of the shape and velocity of a bubble in a still fluid is far from being solved. Most of the models available in the literature make use of three dimensionless parameters to correlate the data, but, according to experimental evidence, the number of independent variables ruling the phenomenon is continuously increasing. The purpose of the present paper is to assess the degree of accuracy of relatively simple and general correlations available in literature for the terminal rising velocity and aspect ratio of a bubble over a wide experimental data set, obtained by injecting bubbles in two different fluids (water and FC-72, a fluoroinert trade mark of 3M) with different injection devices (nozzles and orifices). Both two-components (gas in a different liquid) and one-component (vapor in its liquid) systems were considered. To this aim, a simple experimental apparatus was built and the bubble velocity and shape were determined by analyzing the images taken with a high-speed camera. Measured shapes (aspect ratio) and rising velocities of single bubbles were compared with available correlations. The comparison showed that the aspect ratio was well correlated by the Tadaki number or, to a little lesser extent, by the Weber number. Among the correlations tested, the ones proposed by Taylor & Acrivos and Vakhrushev & Efremov gave the better results in the observed range. Concerning the terminal rising velocity, several correlations were selected and their predictions exhibited generally an error up to 50% throughout the observed range, the best accuracy being given by the recent model of Tomiyama et al. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管其表面上看起来很简单,但是仍然无法解决准确确定静止流体中气泡的形状和速度的问题。文献中可用的大多数模型都使用三个无量纲参数来关联数据,但是根据实验证据,决定该现象的自变量数量不断增加。本文的目的是评估通过在两种不同的流体(水)中注入气泡而获得的较宽实验数据集上气泡的最终上升速度和纵横比的相对简单和一般相关性的准确度。和FC-72,3M的含氟惰性商标),带有不同的注射装置(喷嘴和孔口)。同时考虑了两种成分(气体在另一种液体中)和一种成分(蒸汽在其液体中)系统。为此,建立了一种简单的实验设备,并通过分析用高速相机拍摄的图像来确定气泡的速度和形状。将单个气泡的测量形状(长宽比)和上升速度与可用的相关性进行了比较。比较表明,长宽比与Tadaki数或韦伯数的相关性较小。在测试的相关性中,Taylor&Acrivos和Vakhrushev&Efremov提出的相关性在观察范围内给出了更好的结果。关于终端上升速度,选择了几种相关性,它们的预测通常在整个观测范围内显示高达50%的误差,最佳精度由Tomiyama等人的最新模型给出。 (c)2006 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号