首页> 外文期刊>European journal of orthodontics >Evaluation of the effects of the bonding agent on acid-etched human enamel demineralization: In situ study
【24h】

Evaluation of the effects of the bonding agent on acid-etched human enamel demineralization: In situ study

机译:评价粘合剂对酸蚀人牙釉质脱矿质的作用:原位研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This in situ study evaluated the influence of the bonding agent on demineralization of acid-etched human enamel. Enamel blocks obtained from 20 human molars (four blocks per tooth) were divided into five groups. For the control groups, healthy control (HC, no treatment) and acid-etched control (EC, etching with 35 per cent phosphoric acid for 20 seconds), the specimens were obtained by sectioning in half, one block from each tooth. For the experimental groups, experimental etched group (EE), experimental Concise? group (CE), and experimental Transbond? group (TE), all specimens were etched with 35 per cent phosphoric acid for 20 seconds (EE) and treated with Concise? enamel bond (CE) and Transbond? XT primer (TE). Specimens from the experimental groups were fixed at intra-oral appliances wore by 10 volunteers and exposed to oral environment. After 28 days, the specimens were sectioned in the mesial-distal direction and the enamel cross-sectional Knoop hardness number (KHN, 50 g, 15 seconds) was measured at the cervical and occlusal regions at 25, 50, and 75 μm from the enamel surfaces. Data were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey honestly significantly different test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). Enamel KHN (P < 0.05) was recovered only in the Concise-treated group (CE; P < 0.05). When considering depth measurements, KHN results were 25 > 50 > 75 μm (P < 0.05). None of the groups exposed to the intra-oral environment for 28 days have recovered completely the enamel microhardness, but the order of improvement was better in the CE group than the TE group, the latter being only slightly better than the EE group.
机译:这项原位研究评估了粘合剂对酸蚀人类牙釉质脱矿质的影响。从20个人牙磨牙得到的牙釉质块(每颗牙齿四个块)分为五组。对于对照组,健康对照组(HC,未治疗)和酸蚀对照组(EC,用35%的磷酸腐蚀20秒),将样本切成两半,从每颗牙齿上切下一块。对于实验组,实验蚀刻组(EE),实验简洁?组(CE)和实验性Transbond?组(TE),所有样品均用35%的磷酸蚀刻20秒(EE),并用Concise?搪瓷胶(CE)和Transbond? XT底漆(TE)。实验组的标本固定在10名志愿者穿着的口腔内器具上,并暴露于口腔环境中。 28天后,沿中-远端方向对标本进行切片,并测量牙釉质的努氏硬度值(KHN,50 g,15秒),该值位于距牙根25,50和75μm处的宫颈和咬合区域。搪瓷表面。数据通过方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey进行了非常显着不同的检验分析,以进行多次比较(α= 0.05)。釉质KHN(P <0.05)仅在简明治疗组中恢复(CE; P <0.05)。考虑深度测量时,KHN结果为25> 50> 75μm(P <0.05)。暴露于口腔内环境28天的组中没有一个能够完全恢复搪瓷显微硬度,但是CE组的改善顺序好于TE组,后者仅略好于EE组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号