首页> 外文期刊>European journal of ophthalmology >Intravitreal bevacizumab versus combined bevacizumab-triamcinolone versus macular laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema.
【24h】

Intravitreal bevacizumab versus combined bevacizumab-triamcinolone versus macular laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema.

机译:玻璃体内贝伐单抗与贝伐单抗-曲安奈德联合治疗与黄斑激光光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE. To evaluate the additive effect of triamcinolone to bevacizumab in comparison to standard macular laser photocoagulation versus bevacizumab in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS. In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, 130 eyes of 110 patients with type 2 diabetes with DME were included. Eligible eyes were randomly assigned to 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab (42 eyes) (IVB group) or combination of 1.25 mg bevacizumab and 2 mg triamcinolone acetonide (41 eyes) (IVB+IVT group) or macular laser photocoagulation (47 eyes) (MPC). Central macular thickness (CMT) and visual acuity changes at week 6 and 16 were assessed. RESULTS. The mean age of the patients was 57 -/+7 years. Patients were followed 16 weeks. At week 6, all the three groups showed significant reduction in CMT but the reductions for IVB and IVB+IVT were significantly more than MPC (p<0.001). At week 16, the response was not stable for IVB (p<0.001), but IVB+IVT maintained its superior status to MPC (p<0.001).At week 16, visual acuities were essentially unchanged for the two groups of MPC and IVB and improvement for IVB+IVT was marginal and at most was 0.1 log MAR. No patient developed uveitis, endophthalmitis, or thromboembolic event. CONCLUSIONS. Single intravitreal bevacizumab or triamcinolone plus bevacizumab injection brought about significantly greater macular thickness reduction in diabetic patients in comparison to standard laser treatment. However, the response for bevacizumab alone was short-lived. Reduction in macular thickness was only marginally associated with visual acuity improvement in the triamcinolone plus bevacizumab injection group.
机译:目的。在糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的治疗中,评价曲安西龙与贝伐单抗相比标准黄斑激光光凝与贝伐单抗的相加作用。方法。在一项前瞻性随机临床试验中,纳入了110名2型糖尿病DME患者的130只眼。将符合条件的眼睛随机分配至1.25 mg玻璃体内贝伐单抗(42眼)(IVB组)或1.25 mg贝伐单抗和2 mg醋酸曲安奈德的组合(41眼)(IVB + IVT组)或黄斑激光光凝术(47眼)(MPC) 。评估第6和16周的中央黄斑厚度(CMT)和视力变化。结果。患者的平均年龄为57-/ + 7岁。随访患者16周。在第6周,所有三组的CMT均显着降低,但IVB和IVB + IVT的降低显着大于MPC(p <0.001)。在第16周时,IVB的反应不稳定(p <0.001),但IVB + IVT维持优于MPC的状态(p <0.001)。在第16周时,两组MPC和IVB的视力基本没有变化IVB + IVT的改善很小,最大为0.1 log MAR。没有患者发生葡萄膜炎,眼内炎或血栓栓塞事件。结论。与标准激光治疗相比,单次玻璃体内贝伐单抗或曲安西龙加贝伐单抗注射液使糖尿病患者的黄斑厚度明显减少。然而,仅对贝伐单抗的反应是短暂的。在曲安西龙加贝伐单抗注射组中,黄斑厚度的减少仅与视力的改善相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号