首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
【24h】

Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

机译:MCDM方法折衷解决方案:VIKOR和TOPSIS的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods VIKOR and TOPSIS are based on an aggregating function representing "closeness to the ideal", which originated in the compromise programming method. In VIKOR linear normalization and in TOPSIS vector normalization is used to eliminate the units of criterion functions. The VIKOR method of compromise ranking determines a compromise solution, providing a maximum "group utility" for the "majority" and a minimum of an individual regret for the "opponent". The TOPSIS method determines a solution with the shortest distance to the ideal solution and the greatest distance from the negative-ideal solution, but it does not consider the relative importance of these distances. A comparative analysis of these two methods is illustrated with a numerical example, showing their similarity and some differences.
机译:多准则决策(MCDM)方法VIKOR和TOPSIS基于表示“接近理想”的聚合函数,该函数起源于折衷编程方法。在VIKOR中,线性归一化和在TOPSIS中使用矢量归一化来消除标准函数的单位。折衷排名的VIKOR方法确定折衷解决方案,为“多数”提供最大的“团体效用”,为“对手”提供最小的个人遗憾。 TOPSIS方法确定到理想解决方案的距离最短,而距负理想解决方案的距离最大的解决方案,但是它没有考虑这些距离的相对重要性。通过数值示例对这​​两种方法进行了比较分析,显示了它们的相似性和差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号