...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Inventory competition and allocation in a multi-channel distribution system
【24h】

Inventory competition and allocation in a multi-channel distribution system

机译:多渠道分销系统中的库存竞争和分配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Consider a supply chain involving one manufacturer and one independent retailer. The manufacturer distributes her product to the end consumer through the independent retailer as well as through her direct channel. Each of the two channels faces a stochastic demand. If one channel is out of stock, a fraction of the unsatisfied customers visit the other channel, which induces inventory competition between the channels. Under the scenario described above, will the manufacturer ever undercut the retailer’s order when the capacity is infinite? What are the equilibria of the game? How does a capacity constraint affect the equilibrium outcome? What is the optimal inventory allocation strategy for the manufacturer? Using a game theoretic model we seek answers to the above questions. Both the capacitated and the infinite capacity games are considered. We establish the necessary condition for a manufacturer to undercut a retailer’s order and show that a manufacturer may deny the retailer of inventory even when the capacity is ample. We show that there can be an equilibrium in the capacitated game where a manufacturer might not use the entire capacity and still deny a retailer inventory. We also show that a mild capacity constraint may make both parties better off and thereby increase the total supply chain profit. We develop a simple yet practical contract called the reverse revenue sharing contract and show that along with a fixed franchise fee this contract can coordinates our decentralized supply chain.
机译:考虑一个涉及一个制造商和一个独立零售商的供应链。制造商通过独立零售商以及直接渠道将其产品分发给最终消费者。这两个渠道中的每一个都面临着随机需求。如果一个渠道缺货,那么一部分不满意的客户会访问另一个渠道,这会引起渠道之间的库存竞争。在上述情况下,制造商是否会在容量无限大时削减零售商的订单?游戏的平衡点是什么?能力约束如何影响均衡结果?制造商的最佳库存分配策略是什么?使用博弈论模型,我们寻求上述问题的答案。容量博弈和无限容量博弈都被考虑。我们为制造商降低零售商的订单确定了必要条件,并表明即使容量足够,制造商也可以拒绝零售商的库存。我们证明,在产能有限的博弈中可能存在均衡,制造商可能不会使用全部产能,而仍然拒绝零售商库存。我们还表明,适度的产能限制可能会使双方都变得更好,从而增加总供应链利润。我们开发了一个简单但实​​用的合同,称为反向收益共享合同,并显示了该合同与固定的特许经营费一起可以协调我们的去中心化供应链。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号