...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Optimal tax depreciation with loss carry-forward and backward options
【24h】

Optimal tax depreciation with loss carry-forward and backward options

机译:具有亏损结转和后退选择权的最优折旧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The choice of depreciation method from among straight-line and accelerated methods can have a significant impact on the present value of expected tax payments. This is a problem that has been studied for decades, with most results indicating the optimality of accelerated methods. Recent research questions this claim by relaxing the assumption of positive taxable income. The situation where net-operating losses may be carried-forward and backward in time is the subject of this paper. We model this situation and establish conditions that allow straight-line depreciation to be preferred over accelerated methods. The results are focused around a threshold number of periods of consecutive losses, which are determined by the allowable periods to carry a loss forward. For consecutive losses beyond this threshold, straight-line will always be optimal. When the cumulative depreciation charges up to and including the window are guaranteed to be applied on or before the threshold period, then straight-line will never be optimal.
机译:从直线法和加速法中选择折旧方法可能会对预期纳税的现值产生重大影响。这个问题已经研究了数十年,大多数结果表明加速方法的最优性。最近的研究通过放宽正应税收入的假设来质疑这一说法。净经营亏损可能会在时间上向前和向后结转的情况是本文的主题。我们对这种情况进行建模并建立条件,使直线折旧比加速折旧更可取。结果集中在连续亏损的阈值数量上,该数量由允许结转亏损的允许时间段确定。对于超过此阈值的连续损失,直线将始终是最佳的。如果保证在阈值期间或之前应用累计折旧费用(包括该窗口在内),则直线永远不会是最优的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号