首页> 外文期刊>European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society >A randomised, controlled trial comparing the long-term effects of peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy patients using B-mode ultrasound with modified Seldinger technique versus blind puncture
【24h】

A randomised, controlled trial comparing the long-term effects of peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy patients using B-mode ultrasound with modified Seldinger technique versus blind puncture

机译:一项随机对照试验,比较了采用改良Seldinger技术的B型超声与盲孔穿刺对化疗患者外周静脉置入中心导管放置的长期影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To compare the effects of peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) placement using B-mode ultrasound with the modified Seldinger technique (BUMST) versus the blind puncture. Methods: One hundred chemotherapy patients were recruited to participate in a randomised, controlled trial in Guangzhou, China. Fifty were assigned to the experimental group (using BUMST), and 50 were assigned to the control group (blind puncture). Demographic and background data, data related to PICC placement, complications after PICC placement, the patients' degree of comfort (determined via a questionnaire), and patients' costs for PICC maintenance were collected to compare the effects of the two methods. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to analyse the data; p<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: Nighty-eight of the 100 PICCs were successfully inserted (50 in the experimental group and 48 in the control group). Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a lower rate of unplanned catheter removal (4.0% vs. 18.7%; p=0.02), a lower incidence of mechanical phlebitis (0% vs. 22.9%; p<0.001), a lower incidence of venous thrombosis (0% vs. 8.3%; p=0.037), and a higher incidence of catheter migration (32% vs. 2.1%; p<0.001). Compared with the control group, the experimental group experienced significantly less severe contact dermatitis (p=0.038), had improved comfort at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after PICC placement (p<0.001), and had lower costs for PICC maintenance at 2 months, 3 months and when the catheter was removed (p<0.05). Conclusions: Using B-mode ultrasound with MST for PICC placement reduced complications and patients' costs for PICC maintenance and improved patients' degree of comfort; thus, this procedure should be more widely used. The clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR-TRC-12002749.
机译:目的:比较采用改良Seldinger技术(BUMST)的B型超声在周围插入中央静脉导管(PICC)与盲孔的效果。方法:招募一百名化疗患者参加中国广州的一项随机对照试验。将50名患者分配至实验组(使用BUMST),将50名患者分配至对照组(盲孔)。收集人口统计和背景数据,与PICC放置有关的数据,PICC放置后的并发症,患者的舒适度(通过问卷调查确定)以及患者的PICC维护成本,以比较这两种方法的效果。使用T检验和卡方检验来分析数据。 p <0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:成功插入了100个PICC中的Nighty-88(实验组中为50个,对照组中为48个)。与对照组相比,实验组的计划外导管切除率较低(4.0%vs. 18.7%; p = 0.02),机械性静脉炎的发生率较低(0%vs. 22.9%; p <0.001),静脉血栓形成的发生率较低(0%vs. 8.3%; p = 0.037),导管移位的发生率较高(32%vs. 2.1%; p <0.001)。与对照组相比,实验组发生严重接触性皮炎的情况明显减少(p = 0.038),在放置PICC后1周,1个月,2个月和3个月时的舒适度有所改善(p <0.001),并且成本较低在2个月,3个月以及取下导管时进行PICC维护(p <0.05)。结论:将B型超声与MST一起用于PICC放置可减少并发症并降低患者PICC维护的成本,并改善患者的舒适度;因此,该程序应被更广泛地使用。临床试验注册号:ChiCTR-TRC-12002749。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号