首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Perforation in colorectal stenting: A meta-analysis and a search for risk factors
【24h】

Perforation in colorectal stenting: A meta-analysis and a search for risk factors

机译:大肠支架置入术的穿孔:荟萃分析和寻找危险因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Recent studies suggest that there is a substantial risk of perforation after colorectal stent placement. Objective To identify risk factors for perforation from colonic stenting. Design A meta-analysis of 86 studies published between 2005 and 2011. Setting Multicenter review. Patients All patients who underwent colorectal stent placement. Intervention Colorectal stent placement. Main Outcome Measurements The occurrence of perforation with subgroup analyses for stent design, stricture etiology, stricture dilation, and concomitant chemotherapy, including the use of bevacizumab. Results A total of 4086 patients underwent colorectal stent placement; perforation occurred in 207. Meta-analysis revealed an overall perforation rate of 7.4%. Of the 9 most frequently used stent types, the WallFlex, the Comvi, and the Niti-S D-type had a higher perforation rate (>10%). A lower perforation rate (<5%) was found for the Hanarostent and the Niti-S covered stent. Stenting benign strictures was associated with a significantly increased perforation rate of 18.4% compared with 7.5% for malignant strictures. Dilation did not increase the risk of perforation: 8.5% versus 8.5% without dilation. The subgroup of post-stent placement dilation had a significantly increased perforation risk of 20.4%. With a perforation rate of 12.5%, bevacizumab-based therapy was identified as a risk factor for perforation, whereas the risk for chemotherapy without bevacizumab was 7.0% and not increased compared with the group without concomitant therapies during stent therapy (9.0%). Limitations Heterogeneity; a considerable proportion of data is unavailable for subgroup analysis. Conclusions The perforation rate of colonic stenting is 7.4%. Stent design, benign etiology, and bevacizumab were identified as risk factors for perforation. Intraprocedural stricture dilation and concomitant chemotherapy were not associated with an increased risk of perforation.
机译:背景技术最近的研究表明,放置大肠支架后存在很大的穿孔风险。目的确定结肠支架置入术穿孔的危险因素。设计对2005年至2011年之间发表的86项研究进行了荟萃分析。患者所有接受结直肠癌支架置入术的患者。介入结直肠支架的放置。主要结果测量在支架设计,狭窄病因,狭窄扩张和伴随化疗(包括使用贝伐单抗)的亚组分析中发生穿孔。结果共计4086例患者接受了大肠支架置入术。 207例发生穿孔。荟萃分析显示总体穿孔率为7.4%。在9种最常用的支架类型中,WallFlex,Comvi和Niti-S D型具有较高的穿孔率(> 10%)。 Hanarostent和Niti-S覆膜支架的穿孔率较低(<5%)。支架良性狭窄的穿孔率显着增加,为18.4%,而恶性狭窄的穿孔率为7.5%。扩张并没有增加穿孔的风险:8.5%vs.没有扩张的8.5%。支架置入后扩张亚组的穿孔风险显着增加,为20.4%。穿孔率为12.5%,基于贝伐单抗的治疗被确定为发生穿孔的危险因素,而在支架治疗过程中,无贝伐单抗的化疗风险为7.0%,与无伴随疗法的组相比没有增加。局限性亚组分析无法获得相当大比例的数据。结论结肠支架置入术的穿孔率为7.4%。支架设计,良性病因和贝伐单抗被确定为穿孔的危险因素。术中狭窄扩张和伴随化疗与穿孔风险增加无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号