首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Endoscopic submucosal dissection by using a flexible Maryland dissector: a randomized, controlled, porcine study (with videos).
【24h】

Endoscopic submucosal dissection by using a flexible Maryland dissector: a randomized, controlled, porcine study (with videos).

机译:使用灵活的马里兰解剖器进行内窥镜黏膜下剥离术:一项随机,对照,猪研究(带视频)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive method for en bloc removal of GI lesions. Current ESD methods and devices have limitations, including long procedure times, technical difficulty, safety, and availability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a blunt submucosal dissection technique and compare it with ESD by using the insulated-tip (IT) knife. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, animal study. SETTING: Animal facility laboratory. INTERVENTION: Twelve gastric lesions were marked by using electrocautery. After submucosal injection, a circumferential mucosal incision was created. ESD was then performed by using either the IT knife 2 (n = 6) or the flexible endoscopic Maryland dissector (n = 6). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Median time for IT knife ESD versus median time for Maryland dissector ESD. RESULTS: Median time (IQR) for IT knife ESD was 43 minutes (range 36-50 minutes). The median time (IQR) for Maryland dissector ESD was 32 minutes (range 22-41 minutes; P = .09). The resection specimens obtained with the Maryland dissector tended to be larger, with a median (IQR) of 20.2 cm(2) (range 16.4-23 cm(2)) when compared with specimens resected with the IT knife, which yielded a median (IQR) resection area of 15.9 cm(2) (14.8-18.7 cm(2); P = .08). Complete en-bloc resection including all of the electrocautery markings was achieved in all cases. There were no perforations. There were two minor hemorrhages in the IT knife group and 3 in the Maryland dissector group. LIMITATIONS: Nonsurvival setting, small sample size. CONCLUSION: The flexible Maryland dissector was demonstrated to be efficient, safe, and feasible for facilitating gastric ESD in a live animal model.
机译:背景:内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一种整体清除GI病变的微创方法。当前的ESD方法和设备具有局限性,包括较长的过程时间,技术难度,安全性和可用性。目的:本研究旨在评估钝性粘膜下剥离术,并使用绝缘刀(IT)将其与ESD进行比较。设计:随机,对照,动物研究。地点:动物设施实验室。干预:十二指肠胃部病变采用电灼标记。粘膜下注射后,形成周向粘膜切口。然后使用IT刀2(n = 6)或内窥镜马里兰解剖器(n = 6)进行ESD。主要观察指标:IT刀具ESD的中位时间与马里兰州解剖器ESD的中位时间。结果:IT刀具ESD的中位时间(IQR)为43分钟(范围为36-50分钟)。马里兰解剖器ESD的中位时间(IQR)为32分钟(范围为22-41分钟; P = .09)。与用IT刀切除的标本相比,使用马里兰解剖器获得的切除标本往往更大,中位(IQR)为20.2 cm(2)(范围16.4-23 cm(2))。 IQR)切除面积为15.9 cm(2)(14.8-18.7 cm(2); P = 0.08)。在所有情况下,均完成了完整的大块切除,包括所有电灼标记。没有穿孔。 IT刀组有2处轻微出血,马里兰解剖器组有3处出血。局限性:非生存环境,样本量小。结论:灵活的马里兰解剖器被证明在活体动物模型中促进胃ESD的有效性,安全性和可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号