首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Patient-controlled analgesia with inhaled methoxyflurane versus conventional endoscopist-provided sedation for colonoscopy: A randomized multicenter trial
【24h】

Patient-controlled analgesia with inhaled methoxyflurane versus conventional endoscopist-provided sedation for colonoscopy: A randomized multicenter trial

机译:吸入控制的甲氧氟烷镇痛与常规内镜医师镇静用于结肠镜检查的镇痛:一项随机的多中心试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox, Medical Device International, Melbourne, Australia) has been used extensively in Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) to manage trauma-related pain. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and outcome of Penthrox for colonoscopy. Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Three tertiary endoscopic centers. Patients: Two hundred fifty-one patients were randomized to receive either Penthrox (n = 125, 70 men, 51.4 ± 1.1 years old) or intravenous midazolam and fentanyl (M&F; n = 126, 72 men, 54.9 ± 1.1 years old) during colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurement: Discomfort (visual analogue scale [VAS] pain score), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y [STAI-Y] anxiety score), colonoscopy performance, adverse events, and recovery time. Results: Precolonoscopy VAS pain and STAI-Y scores were comparable between the 2 groups. There were no differences between groups in (1) pain VAS or STAI Y-1 anxiety scores during or immediately after colonoscopy, (2) procedural success rate (Penthrox: 121/125 vs M&F: 124/126), (3) hypotension during colonoscopy (7/125 vs 8/126), (4) tachycardia (5/125 vs 3/126), (5) cecal arrival time (8 ± 1 vs 8 ± 1 minutes), or (6) polyp detection rate (30/125 vs 43/126). Additional intravenous sedation was required in 10 patients (8%) who received Penthrox. Patients receiving Penthrox alone had no desaturation (oxygen saturation [SaO2] 90%) events (0/115 vs 5/126; P =.03), awoke quicker (3 ± 0 vs 19 ± 1 minutes; P .001) and were ready for discharge earlier (37 ± 1 vs 66 ± 2 minutes; P .001) than those receiving intravenous M&F. Limitations: Inhaled Penthrox is not yet available in the United States and Europe. Conclusions: Patient-controlled analgesia with inhaled Penthrox is feasible and as effective as conventional sedation for colonoscopy with shorter recovery time, is not associated with respiratory depression, and does not influence the procedural success and polyp detection.
机译:目的:吸入甲氧氟烷(Penthrox,医疗器械国际公司,澳大利亚墨尔本)已在澳大利亚(澳大利亚和新西兰)广泛使用,用于治疗与创伤有关的疼痛。目的是评估Penthrox用于结肠镜检查的功效,安全性和结果。设计:前瞻性随机研究。地点:三个三级内窥镜中心。患者:251位患者在治疗期间被随机分配接受Penthrox(n = 125,70男性,51.4±1.1岁)或静脉注射咪达唑仑和芬太尼(M&F; n = 126,72男性,54.9±1.1岁)。结肠镜检查。主要结果测量:不适(视觉模拟评分[VAS]疼痛评分),焦虑(状态-特质焦虑量表Y [STAI-Y]焦虑评分),结肠镜检查性能,不良事件和恢复时间。结果:两组之间的前结肠镜检查VAS疼痛和STAI-Y评分相当。两组之间在(1)结肠镜检查期间或之后的疼痛VAS或STAI Y-1焦虑评分方面无差异,(2)手术成功率(Penthrox:121/125 vs M&F:124/126),(3)血压低结肠镜检查(7/125 vs 8/126),(4)心动过速(5/125 vs 3/126),(5)盲肠到达时间(8±1 vs 8±1分钟)或(6)息肉检出率( 30/125与43/126)。接受Penthrox治疗的10例患者(8%)需要额外的静脉镇静剂。单独接受Penthrox的患者未发生去饱和(氧饱和度[SaO2] <90%)事件(0/115 vs 5/126; P = .03),清醒速度更快(3±0 vs 19±1分钟; P <.001)并且比接受静脉注射M&F的患者更早出院(37±1 vs 66±2分钟; P <.001)。局限性:在美国和欧洲尚不可用吸入Penthrox。结论:吸入Penthrox进行患者自控镇痛是可行的,并且与常规的镇静术镇静一样有效,恢复时间更短,与呼吸抑制无关,并且不影响手术成功率和息肉检测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号