首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.
【24h】

Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.

机译:与常规体积的结肠镜检查用聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液相比,橄榄油的施用以及少量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液的使用提高了患者对右侧结肠清洗的满意度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Proper bowel cleansing before colonoscopy is essential for satisfactory evaluation of the colon. The required consumption of a large volume of salty-tasting liquid, 4 L of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS), is the primary limitation to achieving this goal. OBJECTIVE: To achieve better patient satisfaction with efficient bowel cleansing, we compared the effects of the conventional volume (4 L) of PEG-ELS with those of a low volume (2 L) in combination with pretreatment using different laxatives, such as magnesium hydroxide (milk of magnesia) and olive oil. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study. SETTING: A single research hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 120 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 different preparation regimens: 39 patients were prepared with a conventional volume (4 L) of PEG-ELS (Preparation [Prep] 1), and the remaining patients were prepared with a lower volume (2 L) of PEG-ELS and pretreatment with a laxative, either 15 g of magnesium hydroxide (40 patients, Prep 2) or 60 mL of olive oil (41 patients, Prep 3) 3 hours before PEG-ELS administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the efficacy of colonic cleansing on the left and right sides. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction and side effects. RESULTS: The olive oil regimen (Prep 3) resulted in significantly more adequate bowel cleansing of the right colon than administration of the conventional volume of PEG-ELS (Prep 1) and the magnesium hydroxide (Prep 2) regimen (97.6% vs 74.5% and 72.5%, respectively, P = .007). However, this difference was not observed in the left colon (91.5%, 85.5%, and 91.8% for Preps 1, 2, and 3, respectively, P = .776). When asked, 38 patients (95%) taking Prep 2, 35 patients (85.3%) taking Prep 3, and only 11 patients (28.2%) taking Prep 1 preferred the same preparation regimen if they required a future colonoscopy (P =.006), based on ease of use and taste. The side effects were comparable in each group. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study include the relatively small sample size, the single-center study design, and the use of a nonvalidated symptom scoring system. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with olive oil before administration of a low volume of PEG-ELS enhances both patient satisfaction and the quality of right-side colonic cleansing over the administration of the conventional volume of PEG-ELS for colonoscopy preparation. Although the magnesium hydroxide regimen (Prep 2) was the preferred regimen in this study, its colonic cleansing effectiveness was not as great as those of the other regimens. Based on our results, the olive oil regimen is recommended, especially for patients who are not able to consume large volumes of liquids, such as the elderly, and those who are suspected of having subtle right-side colonic lesions.
机译:背景:结肠镜检查前适当的肠道清洁对于满意评估结肠至关重要。消耗大量的咸味液体,即4 L聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液(PEG-ELS),是达到此目标的主要限制。目的:为使肠清洁效果更好,患者满意度更高,我们将常规容量(4升)的PEG-ELS与低容量(2升)的PEG-ELS结合使用不同的泻药(如氢氧化镁)进行了预处理(氧化镁牛奶)和橄榄油。设计:随机对照研究。地点:一家研究医院。患者:接受选择性结肠镜检查的患者。干预措施:将120例患者随机分配至3种不同的制备方案中的1种:39例患者准备了常规体积(4 L)的PEG-ELS(制剂[Prep] 1),其余患者则准备了较低剂量的PEG-ELS。剂量(2 L)的PEG-ELS,并在PEG-ELS施用前3小时用泻药进行预处理,或者使用15 g氢氧化镁(40例患者,Prep 2)或60 mL橄榄油(41例患者,Prep 3)。主要观察指标:主要观察结果是左右两侧结肠清洗的功效。次要结果是患者满意度和副作用。结果:与常规剂量的PEG-ELS(Prep 1)和氢氧化镁(Prep 2)方案相比,橄榄油方案(Prep 3)可以显着更充分地清洁右结肠(97.6%vs 74.5%和72.5%,分别为P = .007)。但是,在左结肠中未观察到这种差异(对于Preps 1、2和3,分别为91.5%,85.5%和91.8%,P = .776)。当被询问时,如果准备进行结肠镜检查,则有38例(95%)接受Prep 2的患者,35例(85.3%)接受Prep 3的患者,只有11例(28.2%)接受Prep 1的患者,如果他们需要将来的结肠镜检查,则首选相同的准备方案(P = .006 ),基于易用性和品味。各组的副作用相当。局限性:这项研究的局限性包括相对较小的样本量,单中心研究设计以及使用未经验证的症状评分系统。结论:与常规量用于结肠镜检查的PEG-ELS给药相比,在少量低剂量PEG-ELS给药前用橄榄油进行预处理可提高患者满意度和右侧结肠清洗质量。尽管氢氧化镁方案(Prep 2)是本研究的首选方案,但其结肠清洗效果不如其他方案大。根据我们的研究结果,推荐橄榄油疗法,特别是对于那些不能大量饮用液体的患者,例如老年人,以及怀疑患有右侧结肠细微病变的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号