首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >ERCP as an outpatient treatment: a review.
【24h】

ERCP as an outpatient treatment: a review.

机译:ERCP作为门诊治疗:回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: ERCP on an outpatient basis could be as safe as on an inpatient basis and may also reduce medical costs. OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature to determine the safety of an ERCP performed on an outpatient basis. DESIGN: A review of the published literature was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and the Web of Science. PATIENTS: Patients who were undergoing an ERCP. INTERVENTIONS: An ERCP on an inpatient or outpatient basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patient and treatment characteristics, complications, and prolonged hospital admissions and readmissions. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in this review, of which 5 were comparative studies, 5 were prospective studies, and 1 was a retrospective study. In these series, a total of 2483 patients underwent an ERCP on an outpatient basis and 2320 patients were admitted overnight after an ERCP. Complications were seen in 184 of 2483 outpatients (7%), of which 72% of complications (107/149) presented within 2 to6 hours, 10% (15/149) within 6 to 24 hours, and 18% (27/149) more than 24 hours after the ERCP. Three percent of the inpatients (82/2320) developed a complication, of which 95% of complications (78/82) presented within 24 hours and 5% (4/82) presented more than 24 hours after the ERCP. A prolonged hospital stay after an ERCP was indicated in 6% of the designated outpatients (148/2483), whereas 3% of outpatients (74/2149) and 1% of inpatients (4/2320) were readmitted after discharge. LIMITATIONS: Limited data available. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that, with a selective policy, an ERCP on an outpatient basis seems as safe as when performed on an inpatient basis.
机译:背景:在门诊就诊的ERCP可能与住院治疗一样安全,并且还可以减少医疗费用。目的:回顾现有文献,以确定在门诊进行的ERCP的安全性。设计:通过搜索PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,EMBASE和Web of Science对公开的文献进行了回顾。患者:正在接受ERCP的患者。干预措施:基于住院或门诊的ERCP。主要观察指标:患者和治疗特点,并发症以及住院和再入院时间延长。结果:该评价包括11项研究,其中5项为比较研究,5项为前瞻性研究,1项为回顾性研究。在这些系列中,总共2483例患者在门诊接受了ERCP治疗,而2320例患者在ERCP治疗后入院过夜。 2483名门诊患者中有184例发生并发症(7%),其中2%至2小时内出现并发症的比例为107%(107/149),6至24小时内出现了并发症的比例为10%(15/149),18%(27/149) )超过ERCP后24小时。 3%的住院患者(82/2320)出现了并发症,其中ERCP术后24小时内出现了95%的并发症(78/82),而ERCP术后24小时以上出现了5%(4/82)的并发症。 6%的指定门诊患者(148/2483)表示需要接受ERCP后延长住院时间,而出院后重新入院的门诊患者为3%(7​​4/2149)和<1%(4/2320)。限制:可用的数据有限。结论:这项审查表明,采用选择性策略,在门诊患者基础上的ERCP似乎和在住院患者基础上进行的ERCP一样安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号