...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental & Molecular Pathology >Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA RT-qPCR for screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer with ThinPrep (R) Pap test samples
【24h】

Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA RT-qPCR for screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer with ThinPrep (R) Pap test samples

机译:HPV E6 / E7 mRNA RT-qPCR通过ThinPrep(R)Pap测试样品筛查和诊断宫颈癌的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent research has shown that oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA, which is currently used in the screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer, can be detected not only in high-grade cervical lesions, but also in low-grade cervical lesions and normal tissues. For this reason, HPV tests targeting the E6 and E7 mRNA of five oncogenic HPV strains (HPV genotypes 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45), which are known to be responsible for the oncogenesis of cervical cancer, have been commercialized using a real-time nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA) assay. Previous data has shown that the real-time NASBA assay has higher clinical specificity than HPV DNA testing (97.1% vs. 53.7%). However, the sensitivity of the real-time NASBA assay was lower than that of HPV DNA testing (41.1% vs. 100%). Despite the fact that there are more than 16 oncogenic HPV genotypes known to cause cervical cancer (HPV genotypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, and 69), the commercialized real-time NASBA kit was designed to detect only five genotypes (16, 18, 31, 33, and 45). Therefore, in the present study, CervicGen HPV RT-qDX (Optipharm), a commercial diagnostic kit targeting a HPV E6/E7 mRNA based on RT-qPCR assay was evaluated with RNA extracted from ThinPrep (R) Pap samples, and the results were compared to real-time NASBA data. The sensitivity and specificity of the RT-qPCR assay were 91% and 98.6%, respectively, for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia CIN2(+) high-grade cervical lesions. Therefore, the CervicGen HPV RT-qDX assay showed a significantly higher sensitivity (91.1%) compared to the real-time NASBA assay (41.1%). In normal cytohistology cases, the specificity was 98.6% and 53.7% for HPV mRNA RT-qPCR and HPV DNA testing, respectively. These results demonstrate that HPV mRNA RT-qPCR better reflects clinical diagnosis. In conclusion, it is suggested that HPV mRNA RT-qPCR overcomes the shortcomings of lower specificity seen in the DNA assay and the lower sensitivity of the commercialized HPV mRNA real-time NASBA assay when testing from ThinPrep (R) Pap samples. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:最近的研究表明,目前用于宫颈癌筛查和诊断的致癌性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA不仅可以在高级别宫颈病变中检出,而且可以在低级宫颈病变和正常组织中检出。由于这个原因,针对五种致癌HPV株(HPV基因型16、18、31、33和45)的E6和E7 mRNA的HPV检测已经商业化,该菌株已知是导致宫颈癌发生的原因。基于实时核酸序列的扩增(NASBA)分析。先前的数据显示,实时NASBA检测比HPV DNA检测具有更高的临床特异性(97.1%对53.7%)。但是,实时NASBA检测的灵敏度低于HPV DNA检测的灵敏度(41.1%对100%)。尽管已知有超过16种致癌的HPV基因型可导致宫颈癌(HPV基因型16、18、31、33、35、39、45、51、52、53、56、58、59、66、68,和69),商业化的实时NASBA试剂盒仅设计用于检测五种基因型(16、18、31、33和45)。因此,在本研究中,使用从ThinPrep(R)Pap样品中提取的RNA评估了基于RT-qPCR测定的靶向HPV E6 / E7 mRNA的商用诊断试剂盒CervicGen HPV RT-qDX(Optipharm)。与实时NASBA数据相比。 RT-qPCR检测对宫颈上皮内瘤变CIN2(+)高度宫颈病变的检测灵敏度和特异性分别为91%和98.6%。因此,与实时NASBA分析(41.1%)相比,CervicGen HPV RT-qDX分析显示出明显更高的灵敏度(91.1%)。在正常的细胞组织学情况下,HPV mRNA RT-qPCR和HPV DNA检测的特异性分别为98.6%和53.7%。这些结果表明,HPV mRNA RT-qPCR可以更好地反映临床诊断。总之,建议从ThinPrep(R)Pap样品进行检测时,HPV mRNA RT-qPCR克服了DNA检测中特异性较低和商业化HPV mRNA实时NASBA检测灵敏度较低的缺点。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号