...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.
【24h】

Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.

机译:平行控制自发和摄动引起的抓握运动:肌电图和运动学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To determine the potential differences in control underlying compensatory and voluntary reach-to-grasp movements the current study compared the kinematic and electromyographic profiles associated with upper limb movement. Postural perturbations were delivered to evoke compensatory reach-to-grasp in ten healthy young adult volunteers while seated on a chair that tilted as an inverted pendulum in the frontal plane. Participants reached to grasp a laterally positioned stable handhold and pulled (or pushed) to return the chair to vertical. The distinguishing characteristic between the two behaviors was the onset latency and speed of movement. Consistent with compensatory balance reactions, the perturbation-evoked reach response was initiated very rapidly (137 vs. 239 ms for voluntary). As well the movement time was shorter, and peak velocity was greater for PERT movements. In spite of the profound differences in timing, the sequence of muscle activity onsets and the order of specific kinematic events were not different between maximum velocity voluntary (VOL) and perturbation-evoked (PERT) reach-to-grasp movements. Peak velocity and grasp aperture occurred prior to hand contact with the target for PERT and VOL movements, and wrist trajectory was influenced by the direction of perturbation relative to the target. To achieve such target specific control for responses initiated within 100 ms of the perturbation, and when characteristics of body movement were unpredictable, the perturbation-evoked movements would need to incorporate sensory cues associated with body movement relative to the target into the earliest aspects of the movement. This suggests reliance on an internal spatial map constructed prior to the onset of perturbation. Parallels in electromyographic and kinematic profiles between compensatory and voluntary reach-to-grasp movements, in spite of temporal differences, lead to the view they are controlled by common neural mechanisms.
机译:为了确定潜在的补偿性和自愿性伸手抓握运动的潜在差异,本研究比较了与上肢运动相关的运动学和肌电图。在十个健康的年轻成年志愿者中,坐在椅子上倾斜成倒立摆的姿势倾斜时,传递姿势扰动来唤起补偿性的伸手可及的距离。参与者伸手抓住侧向定位的稳定把手,然后拉动(或推动)椅子将椅子恢复垂直。两种行为之间的显着特征是发作潜伏期和运动速度。与补偿性平衡反应一致,摄动诱发的到达反应很快启动(137毫秒vs. 239毫秒(自愿)。同样,PERT运动的运动时间更短,峰值速度更大。尽管时间上存在巨大差异,但最大自主运动(VOL)和诱发诱发运动(PERT)的抓握运动之间,肌肉活动发作的顺序和特定运动事件的顺序并无差异。峰值速度和抓地力孔径发生在手与目标接触以进行PERT和VOL运动之前,并且腕部轨迹受到相对于目标的摄动方向的影响。为了实现这种特定于目标的控制,以控制在摄动后100毫秒内启动的响应,并且当无法预测身体运动的特征时,摄动诱发运动需要将与身体相对于目标运动相关的感觉线索纳入人体的最早方面。运动。这表明依赖于扰动开始之前构建的内部空间图。尽管存在时间差异,但代偿性运动和自愿性握力运动之间的肌电图和运动学曲线平行,导致人们认为它们受共同的神经机制控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号